25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

seventeenth <strong>to</strong> the nineteenth century, we know little about the development of ‘<strong>to</strong>wns<br />

lower down the urb<strong>an</strong> hierarchy’. 4<br />

As Patten states: ‘In pre-industrial Engl<strong>an</strong>d the<br />

relations of rural <strong>an</strong>d urb<strong>an</strong> settlements <strong>to</strong> one <strong>an</strong>other <strong>an</strong>d their individual characteristics<br />

are often far from clear.’ 5<br />

Examination of the occupational structure of the <strong>to</strong>wn <strong>an</strong>d its<br />

surrounding villages, throws some light on the development of the <strong>to</strong>wn <strong>an</strong>d its complex<br />

relationship with its hinterl<strong>an</strong>d.<br />

As may be expected of the market <strong>to</strong>wn, Alcester’s population density was always<br />

greater th<strong>an</strong> that of the other, more rural zones during the period of study. 6<br />

As discussed<br />

in Chapter 3, Alcester’s population probably doubled between 1563 <strong>an</strong>d 1676, but then<br />

stagnated in the early eighteenth century. 7<br />

In 1676 its population lay in the r<strong>an</strong>ge 1080 <strong>to</strong><br />

1485, growing by 26.7% <strong>to</strong> a <strong>to</strong>tal of 1625 in 1801. 8 As it wholeheartedly embraced the<br />

needle trade in Period D, its population grew by a rate of 47.7%, (second only <strong>to</strong> that of<br />

Zone D), ending the period with a figure of 2399 in 1841, before declining again in the<br />

mid-nineteenth century. Despite its belated growth spurt, Alcester’s share of the study<br />

area’s population decreased over the period of study. 9<br />

Economic ch<strong>an</strong>ge goes h<strong>an</strong>d in h<strong>an</strong>d with the population figures. Major fac<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

which affected the <strong>to</strong>wn in the eighteenth century, include the turnpike improvements in<br />

the 1750s <strong>an</strong>d 1760s <strong>an</strong>d parliamentary enclosure in the 1770s. The problem of the poor<br />

was ever-present in Alcester as elsewhere. Alcester was one of the places described in<br />

Eden’s report ‘The State of the Poor’. The poor were relieved in their own houses as<br />

long as they could be satisfied with 1s. 6d. per week each. If that was not sufficient they<br />

4 C. Smith, ‘Population growth <strong>an</strong>d economic ch<strong>an</strong>ge in some Nottinghamshire market <strong>to</strong>wns, 1680-1840’,<br />

Local Population Studies, 65, (2000), p. 31.<br />

5 J. Patten, ‘Village <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong>wn: <strong>an</strong> occupational study’, Ag. Hist. Rev., 20, (1972), p.1<br />

6 See Table 3.15 in Chapter 3.<br />

7 See Tables 3.2, 3.3 <strong>an</strong>d 3.4 in Chapter 3.<br />

8 See Table 3.14 in Chapter 3.<br />

9 See Table 3.16 in Chapter 3.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!