25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>an</strong>d Wixford multipliers of 4 <strong>an</strong>d 5 seemed more appropriate. 41<br />

The figure circa 1780 for<br />

Exhall includes the chapelry of Wixford, while for Inkberrow <strong>an</strong>d S<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>an</strong>d Bradley the<br />

number of inhabit<strong>an</strong>ts was given as well as the number of families. 42<br />

As in Zones A <strong>an</strong>d<br />

B, these figures suggest uneven growth or stagnation in m<strong>an</strong>y parishes between 1676 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

1780.<br />

Table 3.9 Baptism numbers in parish registers in Zone C, The Central (Wood-pasture)<br />

Belt 1575-1810<br />

Baptisms (9 year moving average) 1575 1675 1710 1735 1760 1780 1810<br />

Abbots Mor<strong>to</strong>n 4.6 5.4 5.4 4.4<br />

Arrow (with Oversley) 6.6 9.8 9.0 5.9 10.7<br />

As<strong>to</strong>n C<strong>an</strong>tlow *13.3 21.1 17.4 15.4 24.3 23.4<br />

Billesley *0.4<br />

Bin<strong>to</strong>n 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.6 6.3 6.6<br />

Dorms<strong>to</strong>n 3.7 2.6 6.7<br />

Exhall (with Wixford) 4.2 4.2 2.0 *5.9 7.4<br />

Gt Alne 5.3 8.3 8.7<br />

Haselor 6.9 8.0 7.6 9.0 11.4<br />

Inkberrow *25.8 22.0 29.6 29.7 34.2 49.2<br />

King<strong>to</strong>n 4.3 6.4 3.4 3.8 5.3<br />

Kinwar<strong>to</strong>n *2.0 *2.4 *5.3 0.7 0.4 1.9<br />

Mor<strong>to</strong>n Bagot 3.9 5.1 3.3 6.2 4.6<br />

Oldberrow *1.9 3.0 3.8 3.4 5.2 6.3<br />

Rous Lench 5.2 4.8 6.1 5.7 7.2 5.8<br />

Spernall 2.2 2.8 3.7 3.6 1.6 3.2<br />

S<strong>to</strong>ck & Bradley 7.6 6.0 5.2 4.2 4.2 6.2 9.3<br />

Temple Graf<strong>to</strong>n 7.7 6.6<br />

* See footnote for expl<strong>an</strong>ation 43<br />

41 Figures for Billesley were not available for 1676. In order <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>an</strong> overall figure for this zone’s<br />

population in 1676 (used in Table 3.14 <strong>an</strong>d 3.15) <strong>an</strong> estimate was used for Billesley of between 10 <strong>an</strong>d 15.<br />

The number of households in the 1670 Hearth Tax (where known) are as follows: Arrow (with Oversley)<br />

60, As<strong>to</strong>n C<strong>an</strong>tlow 105, Exhall 15, Great Alne 53, Haselor 58, Kinwar<strong>to</strong>n 14, Mor<strong>to</strong>n Bagot 40, Spernall<br />

16, Temple Graf<strong>to</strong>n 47, Wixford 23.<br />

42 For each parish the figure c. 1780 is from the number of families in R<strong>an</strong>some ‘The State of the Bishopric<br />

of Worcester’ multiplied by 4 <strong>an</strong>d 5 respectively. Inkberrow had 889 inhabit<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d 215 families, Bradley<br />

had 124 inhabit<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d 28 families. According <strong>to</strong> Eden, The State of the Poor, pp. 803-804,<br />

(http://find.galegroup.com/ecco, 3.30 p.m., 22 Feb. 2010), in 1761 Inkberrow had 214 families <strong>an</strong>d 947<br />

inhabit<strong>an</strong>ts, in 1770 215 families <strong>an</strong>d 889 souls (as in R<strong>an</strong>some), <strong>an</strong>d 300 families returned <strong>to</strong> Bishop North<br />

in 1776. Inkberrow’s population was thought <strong>to</strong> have grown further <strong>to</strong> 1795, as confirmed in Table 3.10.<br />

43 1675 figures for As<strong>to</strong>n C<strong>an</strong>tlow are based on 1677, for Inkberrow on 1680 <strong>an</strong>d for Oldberrow on 1679.<br />

Kinwar<strong>to</strong>n’s figures before 1760 probably also include Great Alne. Exhall’s parish register also contains<br />

Wixford. The 1780 figure for Exhall is actually based on 1781. The first available figure for Billesley is<br />

based on 1822 not 1810.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!