Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
When 'translated' to the conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> Norman & Shallice (1986)<br />
and <strong>of</strong> Brouwer & Schmidt (2002), the functional model <strong>of</strong> attention<br />
(including gaze control) developed by Knudsen (2007) makes clear that<br />
attentional processes are both active within the CS and within the SAS. Gaze<br />
control can be both bottom-up (in the realm <strong>of</strong> the CS) <strong>of</strong> which the driver is<br />
not aware and can be top-down (in the realm <strong>of</strong> the SAS). Bottom-up gaze<br />
control can result in a bottom-up fixation, but also in a top-down fixation. An<br />
example <strong>of</strong> the former is a fixation on an object because this object is bright.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> the latter are fixations in directions <strong>of</strong> covert latent hazards that<br />
are routine situations for experienced <strong>drivers</strong>.<br />
4.1.7. Differences in eye movements between <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and<br />
experienced <strong>drivers</strong><br />
Eye movements and fixations <strong>of</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and experienced <strong>drivers</strong> have<br />
been recorded with an eye tracker while participants in both groups drove in<br />
real traffic (Crundall & Underwood, 1998; Falkmer & Gregersen, 2005;<br />
Mourant & Rockwell, 1972; Underwood, Chapman, Brocklehurst, et al., 2003;<br />
Underwood & Crundall, 1998). They have also been recorded while<br />
participants in both groups drove in a simulator (Garay-Vega & Fisher, 2005;<br />
Konstantopoulos, Chapman, & Crundall, 2010; Miltenburg & Kuiken, 1990;<br />
Pradhan et al., 2005). Eye tracking equipment has been used while<br />
participants in both groups watched video clips taken from the driver's<br />
perspective (Borowsky, Shinar, & Oron-Gilad, 2010; Chapman et al., 2004;<br />
Chapman & Underwood, 1998; Crundall, Underwood, & Chapman, 2002;<br />
Underwood, Crundall, & Chapman, 2002) and while participants in both<br />
groups watched static traffic scenes (photographs) (Huestegge et al., 2010).<br />
The mentioned studies about eye movements while driving in real traffic<br />
were not about differences between <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and experienced <strong>drivers</strong><br />
in anticipatory eye glances in relation to latent hazards, but about scan<br />
patterns in general. The results <strong>of</strong> these studies are not conclusive. Mourant<br />
& Rockwell (1972) found that <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> looked less far ahead and less<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten in the rear-view mirror than experienced <strong>drivers</strong>. However, the fact<br />
that <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> tend to look in an area in front <strong>of</strong> the care that is closer to<br />
the car, could not be confirmed by Underwood & Crundall (1998) and<br />
Falkmer & Gregersen (2005). On the other hand, in all studies carried out in<br />
real traffic it was found that that <strong>young</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> scan less broadly side<br />
to side as older, more experienced <strong>drivers</strong> do. More over Crundall &<br />
Underwood (1998) found that <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> did not adapt their scan<br />
patterns as well to the complexity <strong>of</strong> the roadway as experienced <strong>drivers</strong> did.<br />
Whereas experienced <strong>drivers</strong> more <strong>of</strong>ten looked to the sides <strong>of</strong> the road in<br />
130