Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.2.9. Discussion<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to explore whether versions <strong>of</strong> the hazard<br />
detection and recognition task <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4 and the risk assessment and<br />
action selection task <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4 with response methods suitable for mass<br />
testing, would show: (1) substantial lower scores on both tasks for <strong>novice</strong><br />
<strong>drivers</strong> than for experienced <strong>drivers</strong>, and (2) substantially higher scores for<br />
crash free <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> than for <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> with self-reported (minor)<br />
crashes. The photo task in this study did not differ much from the risk<br />
assessment and selection task that was applied in Chapter 4. In contrast to<br />
the risk assessment and action selection task <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4, participants had to<br />
respond within the maximum eight seconds a photograph was exposed on<br />
the screen and not after eight seconds when the screen had turned black. A<br />
second difference was a countdown timer bar that was visible at the bottom<br />
<strong>of</strong> the screen. The video task, however, differed genuinely from the task<br />
applied in Chapter 4. In the hazard detection and recognition task <strong>of</strong> Chapter<br />
4, two response methods were used: recorded fixations on overt latent and<br />
covert latent hazards and mentioned latent hazards. In the video tasks<br />
pointing with a mouse and clicking replaced the eye fixations. As much more<br />
time is required to point and click than for a saccade, it was necessary to<br />
freeze the screen during five seconds a view times per clip to allow for<br />
pointing and clicking. In order to prevent possible negative effects from the<br />
interruptions (the pauses), such as the possibility that the pause would<br />
trigger the presence <strong>of</strong> a latent hazard not noticed while the video was<br />
running, pauses were also inserted not containing a latent hazards and<br />
participants were told that incorrect clicks would lower their score.<br />
The difference between learner <strong>drivers</strong> and experienced <strong>drivers</strong> on the photo<br />
task with the learner <strong>drivers</strong> having the highest risk scores was <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
magnitude as in the very similar risk assessment and action selection task in<br />
Chapter 4. The average risk score <strong>of</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> with eighteen months<br />
driving experience was in between the average risk scores <strong>of</strong> the learner<br />
<strong>drivers</strong> and the experienced <strong>drivers</strong>. The average risk score <strong>of</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong><br />
was significantly lower than the average risk score <strong>of</strong> the learner <strong>drivers</strong>, but<br />
not significantly higher than the average risk score <strong>of</strong> the experienced<br />
<strong>drivers</strong>. This could indicate that what is measured by the photo task, and<br />
based on the results <strong>of</strong> Chapter 4 this presumably is more hazard detection<br />
and hazard recognition than risk assessment, improves rapidly after<br />
licensing. This is in line with the rapid decline in crash rate in the first period<br />
after licensing (see Section 1.2). On the very similar risk assessment and<br />
184