08.09.2014 Views

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3.3. Procedure<br />

Participants were seated approximately 60 cm from a 17'' LCD-screen (aspect<br />

ratio 4:3). The resolution was 1024 × 768. The videos were presented full<br />

screen. This provided participants with a horizontal field <strong>of</strong> about 32°. Before<br />

participants started, they watched the instruction video and they practiced<br />

with two trial video clips. The instruction phase took on average five<br />

minutes. The videos were presented in a fixed order as the computer<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware did not allow for changes <strong>of</strong> the order. The time to complete the<br />

task was on average twenty-five minutes. After the task was completed<br />

participants filled in a short questionnaire with questions about<br />

demographics, their driving experience and their computer experience,<br />

including experience with computer games. Participants received no<br />

financial reward for their participation.<br />

5.3.4. Data analysis and design<br />

A between-groups design was applied. Before the actual testing on<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> differences between groups (p < .05), the sample was tested on<br />

the assumptions for parametric testing (normal distribution and<br />

homogeneity <strong>of</strong> variance). These assumptions were met. Prior to the<br />

statistical analysis, the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was<br />

considered. The t-test for independent samples was applied to test for<br />

significant differences between the groups. To test whether experience <strong>of</strong><br />

computer games and age had an effect on the scores, univariate analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

covariance (ANCOVA) was applied. Besides significance <strong>of</strong> results, the effect<br />

size (Partial èta squared, η 2 P<br />

) was considered with η 2 P<br />

= .01 as a small, η 2 P<br />

=<br />

.06 as a medium, and η 2 P<br />

= .14 as a large effect size (Cohen, 1988).<br />

The videos used in Study 2 were partly the same as the videos used in the<br />

study reported in Chapter 4. For one video clip with a covert latent hazard, a<br />

comparison was made between the recorded fixations <strong>of</strong> learner <strong>drivers</strong><br />

(both <strong>young</strong> learner <strong>drivers</strong> and older learner <strong>drivers</strong>) and experienced<br />

<strong>drivers</strong> in Chapter 4 and the position <strong>of</strong> the mouse clicks made by learner<br />

<strong>drivers</strong> and pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>drivers</strong> in Study 2. This video clip is covert latent<br />

hazard 6 in Appendix 1. The participant driver is turning left and can only<br />

see possible oncoming traffic in the lane to the right <strong>of</strong> the lorry at the very<br />

last moment. A video clip with a covert latent hazard was chosen because a<br />

significant difference was found in Chapter 4 between learner <strong>drivers</strong> and<br />

experienced <strong>drivers</strong> in fixations on areas where nothing can be seen, but<br />

from where a covert latent hazard may emerge, with experienced <strong>drivers</strong><br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!