Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.2. <strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>anticipation</strong><br />
A hazard is something (a situation, action or object) that can cause adverse<br />
effects. According to Mills et al. (1996), in traffic a hazard is "any aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road environment or combination <strong>of</strong> circumstances which exposes an<br />
individual to an increased possibility <strong>of</strong> an accident". <strong>Hazard</strong> and risk are not<br />
the same. A risk is the likelihood that a hazard will cause its adverse effects.<br />
This risk can be objective and subjective. Brown & Groeger (1988) used an<br />
objective definition <strong>of</strong> risk. According to these authors, risk is "the ratio<br />
between some measure <strong>of</strong> adverse consequences <strong>of</strong> events and some measure<br />
<strong>of</strong> exposure to conditions under which those consequences are possible."<br />
Armsby, Boyle & Wright (1989) used a subjective definition <strong>of</strong> risk. These<br />
authors defined risk as "the level <strong>of</strong> danger associated with a hazard, as<br />
perceived by the individual". Consider a driver that passes a stationary bus<br />
at a bus stop. This is a hazardous situation, because passengers that have left<br />
the bus may cross the road just in front <strong>of</strong> the bus. No driver will know the<br />
exact objective risk <strong>of</strong> this hazard. The probability that a passenger crosses<br />
the road just in front <strong>of</strong> the bus may be low, but the consequences are<br />
serious. In these situations, <strong>drivers</strong> probably do not assess the risk but feel<br />
the risk. This is to say, they feel an anticipatory emotion that things may go<br />
wrong (Loewenstein et al., 2001). Drivers that pass the bus without reducing<br />
their speed and without looking just before the edge <strong>of</strong> the bus in order to<br />
catch a glimpse <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian that could cross the road as early as possible,<br />
do not show anticipatory actions. They may not have anticipated the possible<br />
pedestrian because they have not recognized the hazard. These <strong>drivers</strong> do<br />
not expect that pedestrians may cross the road in front <strong>of</strong> the bus. It may also<br />
be that <strong>drivers</strong> are vaguely aware <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian who could<br />
cross the road, but they feel no anticipatory emotions that are strong enough<br />
to elicit actions. Finally, it could be that <strong>drivers</strong> are aware <strong>of</strong> the risk, but are<br />
<strong>of</strong> the opinion that pedestrians should obey the rules <strong>of</strong> the road. If<br />
pedestrians cross the road just in front <strong>of</strong> the bus, it is their fault. In the first<br />
situation lack <strong>of</strong> what is mostly named 'hazard perception', is a cognitive<br />
problem (the hazard is not detected and not recognized). In the second<br />
situation, lack <strong>of</strong> hazard perception is an emotional problem (no or too little<br />
feelings <strong>of</strong> risk) and in the third situation, not anticipating the hazard, is a<br />
motivational problem (no willingness to take account <strong>of</strong> road users that do<br />
not obey the rules <strong>of</strong> the road). Whether <strong>young</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> predominantly<br />
do not see potential hazards or predominantly do not feel the risks and/or<br />
are not motivated to anticipate hazards is subject <strong>of</strong> study in Chapter 4.<br />
74