08.09.2014 Views

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2.6. Overt and covert latent hazards<br />

A distinction was made between clicks on overt latent hazards and clicks on<br />

covert latent hazards. In total, there were thirty-two overt latent hazards and<br />

eleven covert latent hazards. The mean percentages correct clicks on overt<br />

latent hazards were: M = 30.0 (SE = 3.4) for learner <strong>drivers</strong>, M = 37.9 (SE = 2.2)<br />

for <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and M = 34.7 (SE = 3.2) for experienced <strong>drivers</strong>. ANOVA<br />

showed there was no significant difference between the groups with regard<br />

to clicks on overt latent hazards, F(2,137) = 1.91, p = .15. In the group <strong>of</strong> <strong>novice</strong><br />

<strong>drivers</strong>, male <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> clicked on 42.4% <strong>of</strong> the overt latent hazards and<br />

female <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> on 32.2% <strong>of</strong> the overt latent hazards. This difference<br />

was significant and had a small effect size, t (72) = 2.16, p < .05, η 2 P<br />

= .056. In<br />

the other two groups, male <strong>drivers</strong> did not differ significantly from female<br />

<strong>drivers</strong> with regard to clicks on overt latent hazards. No significant<br />

differences were found with regard to clicks on overt latent hazards between<br />

the crash free <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and the <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> that had reported at least<br />

one crash, t (74) = 1.05, p = .30.<br />

The mean percentages correct clicks on covert latent hazards were: M = 48.9<br />

(SE = 3.7) for learner <strong>drivers</strong>, M = 47.6 (SE = 2.4) for <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and M =<br />

43.6 (SE = 3.5) for experienced <strong>drivers</strong>. ANOVA showed there was no<br />

significant difference between the groups with regard to covert latent<br />

hazards, F(2,137) = 0.62, p = .54. In all three groups, male <strong>drivers</strong> did not differ<br />

significantly from female <strong>drivers</strong> with regard to covert latent hazards. No<br />

significant differences were found with regard to clicks on covert latent<br />

hazards between the crash free <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and the <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> that<br />

had reported at least one crash, t (74) = 0.28, p = .78<br />

5.2.7. Scores on the photo task<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the final scores<br />

The internal reliability <strong>of</strong> the scores on the eighteen photographs <strong>of</strong> the photo<br />

task was acceptable, α = .68. Figure 5.5 shows the boxplot <strong>of</strong> the results.<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!