Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.4.2. Peer group influences<br />
In adolescence, reckless behaviour most <strong>of</strong> the times does not take place if a<br />
person is alone. The general opinion is that especially during adolescence<br />
peers promote and reward (with praise and esteem) each other's reckless<br />
behaviour. One explanation could be that reckless behaviour promoted by<br />
friends fortifies the bond between these friends. Arnett (1992) however<br />
warns for causal interpretations. It could be that adolescents like everybody<br />
else choose their friends on the basis <strong>of</strong> characteristics they have in common.<br />
A common characteristic could be sensation seeking. If this is the case,<br />
reckless behaviour is not so much the result <strong>of</strong> group dynamics, but the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> a common trait in members <strong>of</strong> the group.<br />
Passengers can strongly influence the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the driver. They can<br />
distract the driver (e.g. by having a conversation with the driver) and they<br />
can also stimulate certain driver behaviour. They can encourage the driver to<br />
take risks (e.g. 'Show us how fast this car is'), but they can also reduce the<br />
risk taking tendencies <strong>of</strong> the driver. The latter is the case when a passenger<br />
makes the driver feel that she or he is responsible for the life <strong>of</strong> the<br />
passenger. In various studies not conducted in Europe it was found that<br />
crash rate increased in the presence <strong>of</strong> passengers (e.g. Chen et al., 2000;<br />
Doherty, Andrey, & MacGregor, 1998; Preusser, Ferguson, & Williams, 1998).<br />
The more occupants in the car and the <strong>young</strong>er the age <strong>of</strong> the driver, the<br />
higher the crash rate was (Williams, 2003). However in two studies carried<br />
out in Europe (Spain and Sweden) no increased crash rate was found when<br />
<strong>young</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> were in the presence <strong>of</strong> passengers (Engström et al., 2008;<br />
Rueda-Domingo et al., 2004). The licensing age in the United States, Canada,<br />
Australia and New Zealand <strong>of</strong>ten 16 is and in some states even <strong>young</strong>er. In<br />
most countries in Europe, the licensing age most <strong>of</strong>ten is 18. The difference in<br />
results could have been caused by the age <strong>of</strong> the <strong>novice</strong> driver. However, it is<br />
not only the age <strong>of</strong> the driver that matters but also the age <strong>of</strong> the passenger(s)<br />
and the gender <strong>of</strong> both the driver and the passenger(s). Chen et al. (2000)<br />
found a higher crash rate for both <strong>young</strong> male <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> and <strong>young</strong><br />
female <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> only when the passenger was male. Simons-Morton,<br />
Lerner, & Singer (2005) observed cars that left parking lots. They identified<br />
the gender <strong>of</strong> the driver and passenger if present and assessed their ages.<br />
Young <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> both sexes drove faster than the general traffic and<br />
followed other vehicles more closely. This effect was stronger for <strong>young</strong><br />
<strong>drivers</strong> (<strong>of</strong> both sexes) in the presence <strong>of</strong> a male teenage passenger. When<br />
<strong>young</strong> <strong>novice</strong> male <strong>drivers</strong> drove in the presence <strong>of</strong> a female teenage<br />
passenger, headways were longer. A problem with all studies about the<br />
45