08.09.2014 Views

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

Hazard anticipation of young novice drivers - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lack <strong>of</strong> hazard perception skills is considered as one <strong>of</strong> the main causes <strong>of</strong><br />

the high crash involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>young</strong> <strong>novice</strong> <strong>drivers</strong>. Already in 1964, Spicer<br />

(cited in Pelz & Krupat, 1974) found that <strong>young</strong> accident-involved <strong>drivers</strong><br />

were less able to detect hazardous elements in filmed traffic situations than<br />

accident-free <strong>drivers</strong>. Different definitions <strong>of</strong> hazard perception have been<br />

proposed in the past decades. Some definitions that are regularly cited are:<br />

• The process <strong>of</strong> identifying hazardous objects and events in the traffic<br />

system and quantifying their dangerous potential (Deery & Love, 1996);<br />

• The ability to detect a hazards, to assess the risk involved in the<br />

detected hazard, to assess one's own ability to deal with the detected<br />

hazard and to compare the results <strong>of</strong> the two assessments in order to<br />

determine whether or not one can cope with the hazard (Brown &<br />

Groeger, 1988);<br />

• The ability to anticipate traffic situations <strong>of</strong> which there are two<br />

separable components; the degree <strong>of</strong> perceived hazard associated with<br />

the situation, and the perception-reaction time to the perceived hazard<br />

(Sagberg & Bjørnskau, 2006);<br />

• The ability to read the road and anticipate forthcoming events (Horswill<br />

& McKenna, 2004);<br />

• Processes related to:<br />

o <strong>Hazard</strong> detection (being aware that a hazard may be present);<br />

o Threat appraisal (evaluating whether the hazard is sufficiently<br />

important to merit a response);<br />

o Action selection (having to select a response from one's repertoire<br />

<strong>of</strong> skills); and<br />

o Implementation (performing the necessary actions involved in the<br />

response that has been selected) (Grayson et al., 2003);<br />

• The process <strong>of</strong> discovering, recognising and reacting to potentially<br />

dangerous situations (Engström et al., 2003)<br />

Two components recur in most definitions: the ability to anticipate road and<br />

traffic events and the ability to assess risks. Perception is just one aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

hazard perception. It is not only the recognition <strong>of</strong> a possible hazard but it<br />

are also the preparatory actions (e.g. speed reduction and 'keeping an eye on<br />

something or someone') that allow for a timely intervention (e.g. braking) to<br />

avert the crash, should the recognized possible hazard materialize. Instead <strong>of</strong><br />

hazard perception, it would be better to use the words hazard <strong>anticipation</strong>.<br />

Anticipation means that <strong>drivers</strong> have to be aware <strong>of</strong> what can happen and<br />

take actions in order to be prepared for possible negative events to come.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!