28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sources for each sector. α IM ji<br />

and α IDji<br />

are the distribution parameters 6 for<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>in</strong>puts by source for a given sector i.<br />

Equation (4) is the formation <strong>of</strong> effective value-added <strong>in</strong>put. It describes the CES<br />

functions adopted to describe substitution possibilities between composite labour and<br />

capital <strong>in</strong> the creation <strong>of</strong> a unit <strong>of</strong> composite primary factor, the value-added factor,<br />

VA i<br />

.<br />

va<br />

(<br />

i<br />

va<br />

α<br />

Ki<br />

i<br />

α<br />

i<br />

Li<br />

i )<br />

VA =<br />

VA<br />

CES( K , L ) = A K + L<br />

i i i i<br />

−ρ −ρ −1/<br />

ρ va i<br />

Here, A VA<br />

i is the efficiency parameter for the composite value-added <strong>in</strong>put formation,<br />

the substitution parameter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>puts form<strong>in</strong>g the composite value-added <strong>in</strong>put.<br />

ρ vai<br />

α Ki<br />

and α Li<br />

are the distribution parameters for capital and labour <strong>in</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

the composite value-added <strong>in</strong>put respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two sets <strong>of</strong> relationships given by Equation (3) and Equation (4) describe how the<br />

top-level variables <strong>in</strong> the overall Leontief comb<strong>in</strong>ation are determ<strong>in</strong>ed. <strong>The</strong> third level<br />

applies only to the effective labour <strong>in</strong>put required for value-added production. This<br />

effective labour is made from five types <strong>of</strong> labour categories (Equation (5)). <strong>The</strong> labour<br />

categories are unskilled, skilled, semi-pr<strong>of</strong>essional, pr<strong>of</strong>essional and self-employed<br />

labour. As <strong>in</strong> the second level, a CES function is specified. This allows for substitution<br />

between labour from different categories <strong>in</strong> the creation <strong>of</strong> a unit <strong>of</strong> composite labour,<br />

L i<br />

:<br />

−1/<br />

ρ Li<br />

L ⎛<br />

−ρ<br />

L<br />

Li = CES Lli = Ai<br />

li<br />

L i<br />

⎞<br />

( ) ⎜∑α<br />

li ⎟<br />

(5)<br />

⎝ l ⎠<br />

<strong>The</strong> effective labour <strong>in</strong>put is a CES aggregation <strong>of</strong> labour <strong>of</strong> different categories with l<br />

represent<strong>in</strong>g the labour category and A L<br />

i<br />

captur<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency parameter for the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> effective labour. α li<br />

represents the distribution parameters <strong>of</strong> category l <strong>in</strong><br />

the effective labour <strong>of</strong> sector i. ρ li<br />

is the substitution parameter that determ<strong>in</strong>es the<br />

elasticity <strong>of</strong> substitution between different labour categories. <strong>The</strong> CES comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

the five types <strong>of</strong> labour assumes a s<strong>in</strong>gle elasticity <strong>of</strong> substitution among all labour<br />

categories (that is, constancy <strong>of</strong> pair-wise substitution elasticities).<br />

(4)<br />

6 If the functional form <strong>of</strong> the equation describ<strong>in</strong>g the formation <strong>of</strong> the composite <strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>in</strong>put<br />

adopted a Cobb-Douglas production technology, the distribution parameters would represent cost shares<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>in</strong>puts by source. However, due to the CES production technology used <strong>in</strong> KEGEM,<br />

then these weights are no longer simply cost shares but what Dixon et al. (1982, 1992) refer to as<br />

modified cost shares. <strong>The</strong>refore, what is referred to here as distribution parameters for <strong>in</strong>puts form<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

composite <strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>in</strong>put are actually modified cost shares. <strong>The</strong> same case follows for distribution<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>puts form<strong>in</strong>g other composites with<strong>in</strong> KEGEM where CES technology is <strong>in</strong>voked.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!