28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3. <strong>The</strong> Distribution <strong>of</strong> Income From Various<br />

Sources <strong>in</strong> the Lake Kyoga Catchment Area<br />

(Survey Data)<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

3%<br />

7%<br />

16%<br />

4%<br />

10%<br />

1%<br />

5%<br />

47%<br />

Other Wetland Benefits<br />

Agriculture<br />

Gifts<br />

Fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Casual Labour<br />

Trade<br />

Rural Services<br />

Brew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Wage<br />

Livestock<br />

When wetlands contribution to agriculture, livestock and fish<strong>in</strong>g was separated out (to avoid<br />

double count<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs) the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come from wetlands benefits fell to 5%.<br />

Agriculture rema<strong>in</strong>s the largest contributor at 47%. Followed by livestock at 16% and fish<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

10%. Trade contributed 7% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> these communities.<br />

Figure 4. Number <strong>of</strong> Off Farm<br />

Income Sources<br />

3<br />

9%<br />

>3<br />

2%<br />

0<br />

21%<br />

<strong>The</strong> survey data revealed that the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

households had recourse to more than one<br />

source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come. Only 21% <strong>of</strong> households<br />

were entirely dependent on agriculture. 43%<br />

had one additional source <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-farm <strong>in</strong>come,<br />

while 36% had two or more sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-farm<br />

<strong>in</strong>come.<br />

2<br />

25%<br />

1<br />

43%<br />

As seen <strong>in</strong> the figure on the next page, the most<br />

common source <strong>of</strong> additional <strong>in</strong>come was casual<br />

labour, with 34% <strong>of</strong> households engaged <strong>in</strong> sale<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour (either for cash or for food) dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

year. This was followed <strong>in</strong> almost equal<br />

proportions by fish<strong>in</strong>g, sale <strong>of</strong> services, and rural<br />

trade with brew<strong>in</strong>g and distill<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g very<br />

closely. Wage earners clearly formed a dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ority, with only 10% <strong>of</strong> households hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

wage earner <strong>in</strong> the family.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!