28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> most common ailments and diseases handled by CBAHWs were gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al<br />

parasites <strong>in</strong> all stock types, trypanosomiasis and tick-borne diseases <strong>in</strong> cattle, and cough<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

small stock. Information was sought on the type <strong>of</strong> the last case handled by each worker<br />

(Table 3). N<strong>in</strong>ety-one percent <strong>of</strong> these workers reported that they attended to the last case<br />

after be<strong>in</strong>g called by the owner <strong>of</strong> the animal, while the rest <strong>in</strong>dicated that they had come<br />

across it dur<strong>in</strong>g their rout<strong>in</strong>e visits to farmers. Eighty-six percent <strong>of</strong> the workers had attended<br />

to their last case with<strong>in</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> one year preced<strong>in</strong>g the survey. Those who had not<br />

attended to any case for a period exceed<strong>in</strong>g one year had ceased practic<strong>in</strong>g, cit<strong>in</strong>g either lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest by livestock keepers <strong>in</strong> their services or their own <strong>in</strong>terest engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> other<br />

activities.<br />

Table 3 -- Type <strong>of</strong> last case handled by CBAHWs<br />

Disease or ailment<br />

% <strong>of</strong> CBAHWs report<strong>in</strong>g this as last<br />

case they handled<br />

Tick-borne diseases 37<br />

Trypanosomiasis 37<br />

GIT parasites 20<br />

Cough<strong>in</strong>g 6<br />

Source: Survey data, 2001.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> the mean number <strong>of</strong> cases handled by CBAHWs for each livestock type<br />

for a period <strong>of</strong> one year prior to the survey was recorded (Table 4).<br />

Table 4 -- Mean number <strong>of</strong> cases handled by CBAHWs for a period <strong>of</strong> one year<br />

prior to the survey for different types <strong>of</strong> livestock 7<br />

Livestock type Mean number <strong>of</strong> cases Std. deviation<br />

Cattle 26.7 43.43<br />

Goats 35.8 47.55<br />

Sheep 13.8 36.55<br />

Poultry 16.3 30.01<br />

Source: Survey data, 2001.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se workers handled about 2,963 cases dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, giv<strong>in</strong>g a mean <strong>of</strong> 92.6<br />

cases per worker per year. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cases handled by each worker varied widely. <strong>The</strong><br />

reason for this could lie with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual-level attributes. Factors that are common to all<br />

CBAHWs, such as cultural attitudes, the prevail<strong>in</strong>g demand for animal health services, and<br />

regulations could not be causes s<strong>in</strong>ce they affect all CBAHWs across the board.<br />

Available literature suggests that the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a CBAHW program depends upon<br />

support and cooperation with the pr<strong>of</strong>essional veter<strong>in</strong>ary system (De Haan and Bekure 1991).<br />

7 Data from three workers were found <strong>in</strong>sufficient and were not used <strong>in</strong> the analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!