28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. Empirical Results<br />

7.1. Description <strong>of</strong> Survey F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

7.1.1. Farm Resources and Gra<strong>in</strong> Production<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia is almost entirely based on ra<strong>in</strong>-fed agriculture and is<br />

characterized by a dom<strong>in</strong>ant harvest (meher)—generally around November and December—<br />

and a secondary harvest (belg)—around May and June. Of course, production cycles vary<br />

among different agro-ecological zones. <strong>The</strong> study areas depend on meher production <strong>of</strong> cereal<br />

crops.<br />

Land is the major farm resource <strong>in</strong> the study areas, and it can be accessed <strong>in</strong> two ways: via<br />

land allocations by PAs and through <strong>in</strong>formal land markets. About 98 percent <strong>of</strong> the sample<br />

households were alocated some land by their PAs.] In addition, 51 percent <strong>of</strong> the households<br />

also acquired some <strong>of</strong> their farm plots through sharecropp<strong>in</strong>g or rental arrangements. Few <strong>of</strong><br />

the sample households (5 percent) shared or rented out their farm plots dur<strong>in</strong>g the year<br />

surveyed. <strong>The</strong> small proportion <strong>of</strong> farmers who shared out their land reflects the bias <strong>in</strong> the<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedure toward relatively better-<strong>of</strong>f farmers, who usually seek additional land. As<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> the methodology section, the selection <strong>of</strong> better-<strong>of</strong>f farmers was deliberate<br />

because the basic research problem, post-harvest gra<strong>in</strong> loss, assumes that there is surplus<br />

production, and therefore, surplus-produc<strong>in</strong>g farmers.<br />

On average, cultivated area per household is about 2.7 hectares. This is on the high side for<br />

the area, which perhaps reflects the importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal land markets. That is, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this study are relatively better <strong>of</strong>f, they tend to have leased <strong>in</strong> land from<br />

resource-poor farmers. Significant variations exist among the three sites vis-à-vis the average<br />

area allocated to production <strong>of</strong> different crops. Table 3 shows the cultivated area under major<br />

crops <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2002/03 ma<strong>in</strong> harvest period. Gra<strong>in</strong>s, largely wheat,<br />

teff, and maize, take the lion’s share <strong>of</strong> total cultivated land: 65 percent <strong>in</strong> Hetosa, 47 percent<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ada, and 75 percent <strong>in</strong> Bako.<br />

Livestock is the other important asset owned by the sample households. <strong>The</strong> study areas are<br />

characterized by mixed farm<strong>in</strong>g and almost all sample households own some livestock.<br />

Various types <strong>of</strong> animals are reared <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g large and small rum<strong>in</strong>ants, pack animals<br />

(equ<strong>in</strong>es), and poultry. An average livestock hold<strong>in</strong>g, exclud<strong>in</strong>g poultry, is 11 animals per<br />

household, which is equivalent to 8.5 tropical livestock units (TLU). 25 Almost every<br />

household owns at least two milk<strong>in</strong>g cows and three oxen, which aga<strong>in</strong> reflects the relatively<br />

better resource endowments <strong>of</strong> the sample households.<br />

Livestock is an important source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come for the sample households. More than one-half <strong>of</strong><br />

the households sell either livestock or livestock products to generate cash revenue. On<br />

average, a household generated about 460 birr from the livestock subsector <strong>in</strong> the year under<br />

consideration 26 . Households enumerated various reasons for sell<strong>in</strong>g livestock and their<br />

products; the ma<strong>in</strong> ones <strong>in</strong>cluded repayment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>put loans (28.1 percent <strong>of</strong> households) to<br />

25 TLU is a standardized measure <strong>of</strong> livestock numbers. (see Abebe 2000).<br />

26 This amount doesn’t <strong>in</strong>clude the revenue generated <strong>in</strong>directly from livestock use, for <strong>in</strong>stance, by rent<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

draft animals to others.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!