28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.2 Econometric Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> econometric analysis focused on the household level determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> wetland diversity, food<br />

security and the productivity <strong>of</strong> the different crop enterprises. For the Wetland Diversity and<br />

Food security econometric regressions each had an ord<strong>in</strong>al dependent variable created as<br />

described above.<br />

We used a maximum likelihood ordered probit regression for the Wetland Diversity and Food<br />

Security analysis, as the use <strong>of</strong> least square estimation procedures would give <strong>in</strong>consistent and<br />

biased estimates. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ordered probit or ordered logit maximum models is the most<br />

appropriate statistical methods for such ordered response data (Amemiya 1985).<br />

<strong>The</strong> econometric models for the Wetland Diversity and Food Security regressions were specified as:<br />

a). WDI h = a i + ∑ b i dist i h + ∑ c i bev i<br />

h<br />

+ u i , u i~ N (0, σu 2 )<br />

b). FSI h = e i + ∑ p i dist i h + ∑ f i bev i<br />

h<br />

+ ∑ g i hc i<br />

h<br />

+v i, v i ~ √N(0, σu 2 )<br />

Where;<br />

variance<br />

WDI h = Wetland Diversity Index <strong>of</strong> household h<br />

FSI h = Food Security Index <strong>of</strong> household h<br />

dist i<br />

h<br />

= a vector <strong>of</strong> the district dummies<br />

bev i<br />

h<br />

= a vector <strong>of</strong> Incomes derived from the wetland<br />

hc i = a vector <strong>of</strong> household characteristics.<br />

u i v i =error terms assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and constant<br />

a i b i c i d i p i f i g i = Parameters estimated us<strong>in</strong>g maximum likelihood estimate method.<br />

In addition, <strong>in</strong> order to improve our understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> productivity,<br />

generalized least square regressions were run to estimate the determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

production per acre for each <strong>of</strong> the major crops produced <strong>in</strong> the study area <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g; cassava,<br />

sweet potatoes, groundnuts, millet, sorghum, maize, beans and simsim. <strong>The</strong> least square<br />

regression for each crop was specified as.<br />

Inc h ci = K ci + ∑ M ic dirt i h + ∑ L c i ss i<br />

h<br />

+ n c iLab +Zci Invest + ui~N (0, σu 2 )<br />

Where;<br />

Inc h ci = Income per acre derived from crop type ii for household h<br />

∑ dirt i h = Vector <strong>of</strong> district dummies<br />

∑ ss i<br />

h<br />

= Vector <strong>of</strong> Seasons<br />

Lab = availability <strong>of</strong> family labour for production<br />

Invest = the <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> productive <strong>in</strong>puts for that crop<br />

K c i m c i h c i n c i r c i z c i are parameters to be estimated us<strong>in</strong>g least squares estimation method for the different<br />

crops.<br />

5.2.1 Econometric Diagnostic Tests and Specifications<br />

All the regressions had potential estimation problems. This be<strong>in</strong>g cross-sectional data, it was<br />

highly suspect with respect to hetero-skedasticity. We tested for hetero-skedasticity us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Cooks and Weisberg (1983) test which showed its presence <strong>in</strong> all the regressions. This problem

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!