28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3: Sectoral Parameters<br />

Agriculture Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Service<br />

Elasticity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>in</strong>put CES 0.80 0.60 0.40<br />

Elasticity <strong>in</strong> value added CES 0.50 0.70 0.60<br />

Elasticity <strong>in</strong> composite labour CES 0.50 0.50 0.50<br />

Elasticity <strong>in</strong> import CES 0.80 0.60 0.40<br />

Elasticity <strong>in</strong> export CET 1.30 0.80 0.30<br />

Source: Average <strong>of</strong> equivalent values used <strong>in</strong> Fargeix and Sadoulet (1994) for Ecuador, Dervis et al.<br />

(1982) for a semi-<strong>in</strong>dustrialised Turkish economy, Dorosh (1996) for Madagascar and Dorosh et al.<br />

(1996) for Niger.<br />

Table 4: Household Consumption Parameters (Income Elasticities) 11<br />

Uhh1 Uhh2 Uhh3 Rhh1 Rhh2 Rhh3 Rhh4 Rhh5 Rhh6 Rhh7<br />

Agriculture 0.90 0.70 0.50 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.70<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.30<br />

Service 0.70 0.80 1.10 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 0.80<br />

Frisch<br />

parameter<br />

-4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -4.50 -4.00 -3.50 -3.00 -2.50 -2.00 -3.50<br />

Source: Fargeix and Sadoulet (1994) and Lluch et al. (1977).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Trade Policy Simulation<br />

<strong>The</strong> policy simulation <strong>in</strong> KEGEM is not a complete removal <strong>of</strong> all trade tariffs but a<br />

calculated reduction <strong>in</strong> the tariff rate. From the <strong>in</strong>put-output and social account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

matrix data <strong>of</strong> 1986, the effective import duty rates were an average <strong>of</strong> 16.4 percent and<br />

25.2 percent for agricultural and manufactured imports, respectively. 12, 13 Table 5 shows<br />

the rates computed by averag<strong>in</strong>g the tariff rates (import duty divided by import values).<br />

11 Uhh1 = Low <strong>in</strong>come urban households; Uhh2 = Middle <strong>in</strong>come urban households; Uhh3 = High<br />

<strong>in</strong>come urban households; Rhh1 = Rural households hold<strong>in</strong>g less than 0.5 ha. and with little additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>come; Rhh2 = Rural households hold<strong>in</strong>g 0.5 ha. with substantial additional <strong>in</strong>come; Rhh3 = Rural<br />

households hold<strong>in</strong>g greater than 0.5 ha. but less than 1.0 ha. with little additional <strong>in</strong>come; Rhh4 = Rural<br />

households (hold<strong>in</strong>g less than 0.5 ha. but less than 1.0 ha. with substantial additional <strong>in</strong>come; Rhh5 =<br />

Rural households hold<strong>in</strong>g greater than 1.0 ha. but less than 8.0 ha.; Rhh6 = Rural households hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

greater than 8.0 ha. (small farms only); Rhh7 = Other rural households.<br />

12 <strong>The</strong>se import duty rates are calculated by the simple formula: tariff rate for sector i = total duty<br />

collections <strong>in</strong> sector i/total imports <strong>of</strong> sector i.<br />

13 <strong>The</strong>se tariff rates are very similar to those calculated us<strong>in</strong>g National Accounts data as import duty<br />

divided by the import values.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!