28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Price-series correlations are convenient measures <strong>of</strong> market <strong>in</strong>tegration s<strong>in</strong>ce they rely only<br />

on price data, which are more readily available than the cost data required to evaluate<br />

<strong>in</strong>termarket price differentials. Many researchers, however, have argued aga<strong>in</strong>st the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

correlation coefficients to measure market <strong>in</strong>tegration as it is fraught with problems. Goletti<br />

and Babu (1994), for <strong>in</strong>stance, have noted that correlation coefficients mask the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

other synchronous factors, such as general price <strong>in</strong>flation, seasonality, population growth, and<br />

procurement policy. This shortcom<strong>in</strong>g has led to a proliferation <strong>of</strong> other methods for test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

market <strong>in</strong>tegration. In this study, therefore, we considered a second measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration,<br />

the bivariate correlation <strong>of</strong> price differences. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> price differences is based on the<br />

observation that market <strong>in</strong>tegration could be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>in</strong>terdependence <strong>of</strong> price changes.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g price differences removes the nonstationarity and common time trends present <strong>in</strong> price<br />

levels solves the problem <strong>of</strong> spurious correlation. A third approach for test<strong>in</strong>g market<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration is the co<strong>in</strong>tegration approach. This approach exam<strong>in</strong>es whether two markets are<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> the long term by assess<strong>in</strong>g whether their prices fluctuate with<strong>in</strong> a fixed band. It<br />

is assumed that prices move together, subject to various <strong>in</strong>dividual shocks that may cause<br />

temporary divergences. If, <strong>in</strong> the long run, they exhibit a l<strong>in</strong>ear constant relation, then they<br />

are said to be co<strong>in</strong>tegrated. In general, a pair <strong>of</strong> price series X t and Y t is said to be<br />

co<strong>in</strong>tegrated if the series are <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>of</strong> the same order <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>in</strong>tegration and there<br />

exists a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the series such that the measure<br />

ε = Y −α<br />

− βX<br />

(1)<br />

1 t<br />

t,<br />

is stationary or <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>of</strong> order zero (Engle and Granger 1991). Such <strong>in</strong>tegration is<br />

abbreviated as I(0). A two-step, residual-based test due to Engle and Granger (1987) is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

used to assess whether pairs <strong>of</strong> markets are <strong>in</strong>tegrated. In the first step, price series are tested<br />

for unit roots us<strong>in</strong>g the augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test to establish the order <strong>of</strong><br />

economic <strong>in</strong>tegration. <strong>The</strong> order <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>in</strong>tegration is the number <strong>of</strong> times the series<br />

needs to be differenced before it is transformed <strong>in</strong>to a stationary series. Once the order <strong>of</strong><br />

economic <strong>in</strong>tegration is established, the next step is to test for co<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> the price<br />

series. To test for co<strong>in</strong>tegration, “co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g regressions” are estimated by ord<strong>in</strong>ary least<br />

squares (OLS), that is prices <strong>in</strong> market i, P i , t, are regressed on prices <strong>in</strong> market j, P j , t , thus:<br />

P =<br />

i, t α + 0 δ 1 P + (2)<br />

j, t et<br />

<strong>The</strong> residuals from this regression are then tested for the presence <strong>of</strong> unit roots. In theory, if<br />

market i is co<strong>in</strong>tegrated with market j, then market j should be co<strong>in</strong>tegrated with market i. In<br />

practice, however, test results may differ. For this reason co<strong>in</strong>tegration tests are typically<br />

repeated for all the markets, <strong>in</strong>terchang<strong>in</strong>g the left-hand and right-hand price variables<br />

(Ngugi, Mataya, and Ng’ong’ola 1997).<br />

To test for Granger causality, Goletti and Babu (1994) suggest the follow<strong>in</strong>g error correction<br />

model:<br />

Δ<br />

Pi<br />

t<br />

,<br />

=α i + o α i 1 P + i, t − 1 α i 2 P t<br />

j 1<br />

k<br />

, − + ∑ =<br />

=<br />

m i<br />

k 1<br />

δ i k ΔPi<br />

t −k<br />

h<br />

,<br />

+ ∑ =<br />

=<br />

n i<br />

λ i h ΔP j t −h<br />

h 0<br />

,<br />

(3)<br />

where: Δ is the difference operator; m i and n i are the number <strong>of</strong> lags; and the α’s, δ’s and λ’s<br />

are parameters to be estimated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!