28.01.2015 Views

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

The Future of Smallholder Farming in Eastern Africa - Uganda ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.1.3. Gra<strong>in</strong> Market<strong>in</strong>g Practices and Patterns<br />

N<strong>in</strong>ety-n<strong>in</strong>e percent <strong>of</strong> all farmers reported that they sell some crops under normal conditions.<br />

Some farmers also purchased gra<strong>in</strong> crops; about 40 percent <strong>of</strong> the respondents purchased<br />

crops us<strong>in</strong>g their previous sav<strong>in</strong>gs. Crops are usually sold <strong>in</strong> a staggered pattern across the<br />

quarters <strong>of</strong> a year. Table 11 shows the share <strong>of</strong> total gra<strong>in</strong> output produced that is marketed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> marketed surplus to total output for Hetosa was 40 percent; for Ada, 63 percent;<br />

and for Bako, 48 percent. With the exception <strong>of</strong> Ada, more than one-half <strong>of</strong> total production<br />

does not reach the market; it is consumed with<strong>in</strong> the farm household. That farmers do<br />

produce a large assortment <strong>of</strong> crops and sell some proportion (not most) <strong>of</strong> it reflects the<br />

extent to which production is oriented toward household consumption rather than sale.<br />

However, the proportion <strong>of</strong> total production that is marketed—the extent to which a given<br />

crop resembles a “cash crop”—varies among crops as well as sites. A considerably higher<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> the major crops, wheat, teff, and maize, was marketed,<br />

compared with other crops <strong>in</strong> Hetosa, Ada, and Bako. Obviously, these three crops are<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> area cultivated as well as output. For example, 65 percent <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

cultivated area <strong>in</strong> Hetosa was allocated to wheat production, and about 42 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

output was marketed. Similarly, <strong>of</strong> the total cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Ada, 47 percent was allocated<br />

to teff, while 32 percent was allocated to wheat production; the proportion <strong>of</strong> teff that was<br />

marketed was 67 percent and the share <strong>of</strong> wheat marketed was 57 percent. In Bako, 75<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the land cultivated was allocated to maize, and 44 percent <strong>of</strong> the output was<br />

marketed.<br />

Table 11 Percentage <strong>of</strong> crops marketed <strong>of</strong> total output produced<br />

Crops Hetosa Ada Bako<br />

Teff 0.0 67.0 3.9<br />

Barley 0.0 14.1 ---<br />

Wheat 41.9 57.4 ---<br />

Maize 5.2 0.0 44.0<br />

Sorghum 1.5 --- 12.6<br />

Horse bean 1.8 14.6 0.0<br />

Field pea 1.8 11.2 ---<br />

Chickpea 0.0 47.4 ---<br />

Others 0.0 31.9 29.1<br />

All crops 39.7 63.2 48.3<br />

On aggregate levels, the proportion <strong>of</strong> actually marketed output dur<strong>in</strong>g the first quarter <strong>of</strong><br />

2002 was about 51 percent <strong>of</strong> total marketable surplus for the entire year. <strong>The</strong> average<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> crops sold decl<strong>in</strong>es as one moves from the first quarter to the fourth quarter<br />

(Figure 4a). To the contrary, the producers’ prices tend to rise as one moves from the first<br />

quarter through to the third and, <strong>in</strong> some cases, even dur<strong>in</strong>g the fourth quarter (Figures 4b–<br />

4d).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!