10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Motorization rate (number <strong>of</strong> cars/ 1000 people): this indicator was selected because <strong>of</strong> itsrelevance in describing the transportation habits <strong>of</strong> a country. As there are also two other indicatorsdealing with road transport, a weight <strong>of</strong> 2,5 was chosen.Emissions <strong>of</strong> PM from road transport (kg/capita): This indicator was considered relevant inassessing the pollution deriving from the transportation sector. As there are also two other indicatorsdealing with road transport, a weight <strong>of</strong> 3 was chosen. This indicator can be criticized on the groundsthat the average population densities <strong>of</strong> EU27 countries differ greatly.Emissions <strong>of</strong> acidifying substances (kg/capita): together with the other two indicators relativeto pollution, it assesses the air quality <strong>of</strong> the countries considered. A problem with industry emissions isthat production <strong>of</strong> consumer goods is global <strong>and</strong> an economy consuming products <strong>of</strong> industriesproducing acidifying substances might not be the same statistical geographic entity. A weight <strong>of</strong> only 1,5was chosen, as it is difficult to estimate the emissions deriving from industries established abroad(especially in Asia) by EU countries.Emissions <strong>of</strong> ozone precursors (kg/capita): the same description <strong>of</strong> the previous indicator isvalid.Domestic Material Consumption (tonne/capita): this indicator was chosen because it assessesthe amount <strong>of</strong> material used by an economy. For this indicator data was adequately available only from2000 onwards.Area under organic farming (% <strong>of</strong> utilized agricultural area): this indicator was selected in orderto give information concerning the consumers’ dem<strong>and</strong> for organic produce. For this indicator data wasadequately available only from 2000 onwards.2.1.3. Economic dimension indicatorsWeight 2 3 3 2 3Ranking logicNormal Reversed Normal Reversed NormalIndicatorTotal R&Dexpenditure(%<strong>of</strong> GDP)Generalgovernmentgross debtGDP per capitain PurchasingPowerSt<strong>and</strong>ards(PPS) (EU-27 =100)EnergydependencyTotalemploymentrate (%)Total R&D expenditure (% <strong>of</strong> GDP): this indicator was selected for its relevancy in evaluating thewillingness <strong>of</strong> a government to invest in research <strong>and</strong> <strong>development</strong>, as well as the amount <strong>of</strong> moneyavailable for that. However, a weight <strong>of</strong> only 2 was chosen because the added sustainability largelydepends on what type <strong>of</strong> R&D activities derive from these investments.General government gross debt (% <strong>of</strong> GDP): this indicator was selected to give informationconcerning the financial health <strong>of</strong> the governments in the EU countries. As it is considered quite relevantto assess the economic prosperity, a weight equal to 3 was given.13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!