trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

Recapping the above discussion, the method proposed in this paper is particularly useful foranalysing and developing complex systems, the boundaries of which are difficult to establish and theimpact factors of which are very heterogeneous in their nature and degree of impact. The method allowsfocusing on the crucial actors, mapping the interdependencies between them and utilising thisinformation for changing the systems towards better stability and feasibility.ReferencesAdams, William M. (2006) The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development inthe twenty-first century, Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31.Callon, Michel (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and thefishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In John Law (ed.) Power, action and belief: A new sociology ofknowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 196-223.Cohen, Boyd & Winn, Monika (2007) Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainableentrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22 (1), 29-49.Cote, Raymond & Hall, Jeremy (1995) Industrial parks as ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production,Vol. 3 (1–2), 41–46.Ehrenfeld, John R. & Gertler, Nicholas (1997) The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg.Industrial Ecology. Vol. 1 (1), 67–80.Eilering, Janet A.M. & Vermeulen, Walter J.V. (2004) Eco-industrial parks: toward industrial symbiosisand utility sharing in practice’. Progress in Industrial Ecology, Vol. 1 (1–3), 245–270.Heiskanen, Eva & Rask, Mikko (2008) From Sociotechnical Theory to Sociotechnical Practice: An ActionResearch Project, Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for Action, 10-11 March2008, Brussels, Belgium. Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange(SCORE!) Network, supported by the EU’s 6th Framework Programme.Hellström, Magnus (2005) Business concepts based on modularity: a clinical inquiry into the businessof delivering projects. Doctoral dissertation. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademis förlag.Korhonen, Jouni & Niutanen, Ville (2004) What is the potential of the ecosystem metaphor inagricultural and food industry systems? International Journal of Agricultural Resources,Governance and Ecology, Vol. 3 (1–2), 33–57.Latour, Bruno (1987) Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society,Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-network theory, Oxford:University Press.Markowski, Krys (2008) Actor-Network-Theory for Project Management: use it or bin it? 22 nd IPMAWorld Congress “Project Management to Run”, 9-11 November 2008, Rome, Italy.Markowski, Krys & Csösz, Stefan (2008) Emerging controversies in project management and theirimpact on the dynamics between project practitioners, consultants and researchers. 22 nd IPMAWorld Congress “Project Management to Run”, 9-11 November 2008, Rome, Italy.Ny, Henrik – MacDonald, Jamie P. – Broman, Göran – Yamamoto, Ryoichi & Robèrt, Karl-Henrik(2006) Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries — an Approach to Make Life CycleManagement Strategic’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 10 (1–2), 61-77.Purvis, Martin – Grainger, Alan (2004) Exploring Sustainable Development: GeographicalPerspectives, London: Earthscan.Sage, Daniel – Dainty, Andrew & Brookes, Naomi (2011) How actor-network theories can help inunderstanding project complexities. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol.4 (2), 274–293.van der Duim, Rene (2005) Tourismscapes: An actor-network perspective on sustainable tourismdevelopment, WUR Wageningen.457