10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Theory <strong>and</strong> LiteratureTo achieve excellence in education for sustainability, it is necessary to promote interdisciplinaryknowledge building (European Commission 2003), <strong>and</strong> the disciplinary competences <strong>and</strong> perspectiveshave to be re-evaluated. Design, <strong>and</strong> <strong>sustainable</strong> design even more so, is merging values <strong>and</strong> knowledgebetween domains <strong>of</strong> society, as it must address "several dimensions <strong>of</strong> stakeholder activities <strong>and</strong>systemic levels related to the product or service" (Shedr<strong>of</strong>f 2009, 5).Co-operation is the foundation on which innovations occur (Ibid., 12). This, however, puts emphasison the framework for collaboration. How could this framework be designed in such a way that it wouldpromote innovation, but at the same time orientate the collaborators <strong>and</strong> their disciplinary perspectivestowards more <strong>sustainable</strong> outcomes?Balancing sustainabilitySustainable design should weight different possibilities in three different dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>sustainable</strong><strong>development</strong>, as is visible in the famous diagrams that link the ecological, economic <strong>and</strong> socioculturalaspects. These dimensions can be perceived to interact equally, or then hierarchically (see Fig. 1).Figure 1The triangular versus the "nested" model for <strong>sustainable</strong> <strong>development</strong> (Source:Gidding et al. 2002)The traditional triangular model that is separated into three different areas, "<strong>of</strong>ten leads to a narrowtechno-scientific approach" (Gidding et al. 2002, 187). In hierarchical or "nested" <strong>sustainable</strong><strong>development</strong>, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, the "economy is dependent on society <strong>and</strong> both dependent on theenvironment" (Ibid., 192). A systems perspective requires appreciation <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing "in regard tothe interaction between various systems" in the three dimensions <strong>of</strong> sustainability (Shedr<strong>of</strong>f 2009, 5),<strong>and</strong> one should bear in mind this hierarchy <strong>of</strong> these dimensions, <strong>and</strong> the fact that the sociocultural – notto mention the economic aspects – should still follow the limits <strong>of</strong> the ecosystem.At the same time the systemic order <strong>of</strong> the focus areas from the nested approach helps to prioritizethe compromises that have to be made during the design processes. Sustainable design focuses onsolutions that are better for society, environment <strong>and</strong> economy, but in the end the selected focus dictatesthe order <strong>of</strong> things. To follow the systemic approach, a team should first iteratively assess their shared264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!