10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

points <strong>of</strong> view means that the use <strong>of</strong> materials must be reduced in order to minimise adverseenvironmental impacts while at the same time ever diminishing amounts <strong>of</strong> materials should produce arelatively increasing degree <strong>of</strong> economic welfare which is distributed in an increasingly equitable manner(Helminen 1998, 38).The Development <strong>of</strong> Finnish Eco-efficiency has been analysed according to EU guidelines by usingGDP -data <strong>and</strong> the material flow aggregates <strong>of</strong> FIN-MFA Accounting System. The <strong>trends</strong> <strong>of</strong> GDP/DMI<strong>and</strong> GDP/TMR are presented in figure 6.21,81,61,41,210,81960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005GDP/DMI GDP/TMRFigure 6. Development <strong>of</strong> Eco-efficiency <strong>of</strong> the Finnish Economy (1960=100)Figure 6 gives a quite worrying picture about the <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Finnish Eco-efficiency. Earlier Ecoefficiencyanalysis based on the Malinda Accounting system suggested improvement by Factor 2.2 inEco-Efficiency measured by GDP/DMF (see H<strong>of</strong>frén 2001). The improved FIN-MFA accounts cause thatthe increase in Eco-efficiency is remained much lower that earlier measured. It seems that Finnish Ecoefficiencyhas almost stabized since 1975 <strong>and</strong> has then only slightly improved. The ecomony-wide Ecoefficiencyanalysis describes only relative changes in input <strong>and</strong> output variables <strong>and</strong> forgets the absoluteglobal limits. However, in spite <strong>of</strong> this shorthcoming Eco-efficiency analysis provides new insight to thefunctioning <strong>of</strong> an economy as a whole. (e.g. see H<strong>of</strong>frén <strong>and</strong> Korhonen 2007, H<strong>of</strong>frén 2006)9. ConclusionsThe Finnish domestic material flow indicators are constantly growing. This also case with the<strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> material flows <strong>of</strong> foreign trade. There the main driver has been the growth <strong>of</strong> hiddenflows (ecological rucksacks). Although most increases in past have occurred during 1980’s, 1990’s <strong>and</strong>2000’s, their <strong>trends</strong> seem to be constantly growing. The Finnish DMI <strong>and</strong> TMR indicators imply noindication <strong>of</strong> dematerialization or immaterialisation processes as they have been constantly growing.Also the picture about the <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Finnish Eco-efficiency is quite a worrying one. The improvedFIN-MFA accounts cause that the increase in Eco-efficiency is remained much lower that earliermeasured. It seems that Finnish Eco-efficiency has almost stabilized since 1975 <strong>and</strong> has then onlyslightly improved.84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!