10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Introduction <strong>and</strong> BackgroundThe <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong> large scale industrial production systems based on renewable resources, rather thannon-renewable ones, is a crucial item on the international agenda, in times <strong>of</strong> increasing depletion <strong>of</strong>fossil reservoirs. In such a framework, biomass <strong>and</strong>, in particular, plant-based raw materials are <strong>of</strong> greatinterest from both economic <strong>and</strong> ecological st<strong>and</strong>points as alternative feedstocks for industrialproduction, addressing both the energy <strong>and</strong> non-energy sectors including chemicals <strong>and</strong> materials (EC,2004).The search for new sources <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>and</strong> materials gave rise to an intensified exploitation <strong>of</strong>available l<strong>and</strong> for energy cropping: energy cropping is however constrained by the large amount <strong>of</strong> soilrequired for the production <strong>of</strong> raw materials. Soil use as well as other related environmental resources(water, topsoil, biodiversity etc.) affected by energy cropping are source <strong>of</strong> growing concerns aboutenvironmental, ecological <strong>and</strong> social impacts.In order to prevent competition for arable l<strong>and</strong>s in food production, non-food crops on marginall<strong>and</strong>s have recently been promoted, where “marginal” refers to ab<strong>and</strong>oned or degraded l<strong>and</strong>s with lowinherent productivity <strong>and</strong> no quality for agricultural uses (UNEP, 2007). Cropping bioenergy canovercome these l<strong>and</strong>s’ economically unattractiveness <strong>and</strong> unsuitability for food production. In Campaniaregion (southern Italy), a significant portion <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s can be considered marginal because <strong>of</strong> insufficienteconomic return <strong>and</strong> also serious pollution level generated by inaccurate or illegal disposal <strong>of</strong> industrial<strong>and</strong> urban waste. As a consequence, growing non-food crops may provide an extraordinary opportunityto add value to these idle l<strong>and</strong>s, producing both bioenergy <strong>and</strong> biomaterials in the wider perspective <strong>of</strong>the biorefinery concept, intending for biorefinery “the <strong>sustainable</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> biomass into a spectrum<strong>of</strong> value-added products (chemicals, materials, food <strong>and</strong> feed) <strong>and</strong> energy (bi<strong>of</strong>uels, power <strong>and</strong> heat)”(Kamm & Kamm, 2004, 137-145).In the present study, within the EU funded SMILE project, Brassica carinata was chosen as a likelynon-food crop suitable for biodiesel production <strong>and</strong> biochemicals extraction in Campania region, thanksto the perfect overlapping <strong>of</strong> climate conditions <strong>and</strong> cultivar constraints. Two alternative scenarios wereexplored: cropping B. carinata on marginal l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Campania region for energy purpose only or withinthe biorefinery perspective <strong>of</strong> energy, biomaterials <strong>and</strong> biochemicals. Environmental, energetic,economic, technological <strong>and</strong> social aspects were assessed by means <strong>of</strong> an exp<strong>and</strong>ed LCA approach,named SUMMA (SUstainability Multimethod Multiscale Assessment). The capability <strong>of</strong> the evaluationframework adopted in accounting for crucial steps <strong>and</strong> performances <strong>of</strong> the agricultural process on theterritory was incremented by combining the full view <strong>of</strong> the extended LCA with the visualization power<strong>of</strong> GIS (Geographic Information System).2. Material <strong>and</strong> MethodsBrassica carinataThe selection <strong>of</strong> the crop is crucial. Several criteria need to be considered: potential yield per hectare,adaptation to climate conditions, field requirement (fertilizers, pest <strong>and</strong> weed control), biomasscharacteristics, potential use, among others (EPOBIO, 2007). B. carinata was herein chosen because44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!