10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the competence to help develop dematerialization strategies for the benefit <strong>of</strong> society <strong>and</strong> the entireecosystem without sacrificing quality <strong>of</strong> life.Finally, as the nature <strong>of</strong> design practices shifts towards co-design <strong>and</strong> co-creation; as design agencyis increasingly available to non-designers; <strong>and</strong> as social innovation continues to increase in scope <strong>and</strong>relevance, the traditional jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> design as a pr<strong>of</strong>ession is called into question. Value is no longerevaluated in chains but in networks, <strong>and</strong> defining design value is also a question <strong>of</strong> deciding upon one’sjurisdiction. Figure 3 illustrates our perspective on exp<strong>and</strong>ing design jurisdiction.Figure 3.Design Value <strong>and</strong> Design Jurisdiction.4. SurveyThe Framework for Strategic Sustainable DevelopmentAs emphasized earlier, we base our work on the FSSD, which we have used to guide the principles <strong>and</strong>hypotheses underlying our survey <strong>and</strong> the Sustainable Design Barometer project. According to the FSSD,all complex systems can be divided into five levels: System, Success, Strategy, Actions <strong>and</strong> Tools. Forplanning in systems as complex as the ecosystem, a traditional definition <strong>of</strong> success is not sufficient: wemust define our aims <strong>and</strong> goals in a principled way.In essence, for successful design within the ecosystem <strong>and</strong> society, we need a principled definition <strong>of</strong>a <strong>sustainable</strong> society. This definition must be science-based, necessary for sustainability, sufficient forsustainability, general, concrete <strong>and</strong> preferably distinct (Robèrt et al, 2002). The framework’s foursystem conditions, i.e. sustainability principles, have therefore been defined <strong>and</strong> developed according toa widely accepted scientific consensus, <strong>and</strong> they represent the only limits a designer needs to consider inher work:In a <strong>sustainable</strong> society, nature is not subject to(SP1) systematically increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> substances extracted from the earth's crust.(SP2) systematically increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> substances produced by society.(SP3) systematically increasing degradation by physical means.520

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!