10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

analysis <strong>and</strong> literature survey form the basis for the research. In addition, the web-based survey forhauliers can be seen as a part <strong>of</strong> environmental scanning. As a combination <strong>of</strong> the results gained by thesemethods we form scenarios in interaction with the policy makers in special workshops to give input tothe decision making that shapes the <strong>future</strong> <strong>of</strong> energy efficiency <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions. Another reason forthe variety <strong>of</strong> methods is that there simply isn’t data available to be gathered by using one single method.Even though there is relatively good statistics available for modelling, some important aspects aremissing in the data.In this context, the literature survey has the possibility to give descriptions as well as projections <strong>of</strong>different aggregates <strong>and</strong> key ratios in the framework. Currently there are especially UK based studiesavailable, where the framework has been utilised in order to make projections considering the <strong>future</strong>(e.g. Piecyk 2010, already discussed in Chapter 3). Methods implemented in these studies have variedfrom statistical methods to expert methods, such as Delphi. Because <strong>of</strong> the differences betweencountries, the results <strong>of</strong> these studies are only limitedly exploitable in other countries. From theperspective <strong>of</strong> methods, usually the same ones can be applied, which give the researchers thepossibilities to learn from each other as well as to do comparisons where applicable. For the statisticalmethods the limitations <strong>of</strong> the available <strong>and</strong> good-quality data may restrict making comparable studiesin different countries.The shorter timeframe, in this case five years, can be seen as projection <strong>of</strong> the past <strong>development</strong>, asthe changes occurring tend to be limited – especially compared to the timeframe <strong>of</strong> 20 years. Thereforethe statistical methods <strong>and</strong> modelling, especially trend extrapolation, can be seen suitable for making abase forecast for the next five years. For Finl<strong>and</strong>, there is comparable statistics (Goods transport by roadstatistics, GTRS) available since 1995 <strong>and</strong> with the help <strong>of</strong> this data we can calculate the key ratios in theframework. Since the rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is that there should be at least two times more historical data thanthe extrapolated period is (May 1996), we can utilise extrapolation for the time period <strong>of</strong> five years, butnot fairly for a much longer period. By making extrapolations we assume that the same forces that haveinfluenced the aggregates <strong>and</strong> key ratios in the framework will continue to have the same effects theyhave had, or at least that for some reason the outcome, the <strong>trends</strong>, would be the same as before.In Table 1 we present the data sources <strong>and</strong> the calculations used in the statistical modelling. Thetrend extrapolation is made based on the <strong>trends</strong> in the key ratios. This approach <strong>and</strong> the results forFinl<strong>and</strong> are discussed in more detail in Liimatainen <strong>and</strong> Pöllänen (2010).442

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!