10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

then represents the strongest tool for companies in this respect. Given the above, the overall attitude <strong>of</strong>the Global Compact to the governance <strong>of</strong> supply chains thus appears to be predominantly as assigning tocontracts an enforcing role. But s<strong>of</strong>t, relational ways <strong>of</strong> enforcement are envisaged.The UN Norms on the Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> Transnational Corporations <strong>and</strong> Other BusinessEnterprises with regard to Human Rights (UN Norms) were developed with the intention to become abinding instrument. However, even though derived from customary international law <strong>and</strong> internationaltreaties, they remained only a s<strong>of</strong>t-law instrument. Nevertheless, the contractual power <strong>of</strong> companies isfully explored here <strong>and</strong> expected to be used for enhancing socially responsible behavior throughoutsupply chains. Article 1 states that companies have within their “sphere <strong>of</strong> influence” (UN Human RightsCouncil 2008) “obligation” not only to “promote” but also to “secure” respect for <strong>and</strong> fulfillment <strong>of</strong>human rights. The obligation is further detailed throughout the text <strong>and</strong> in article 15 the contractualpractices are tackled. According to this provision, companies should “incorporate the UN Norms into alltheir contracts” <strong>and</strong> do business only with entities following the UN Norms or other similar set <strong>of</strong>principles. Contracts thus serve as a tool for enforcement <strong>of</strong> internationally accepted human rightsst<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> principles. The UN Norms on the other h<strong>and</strong> exclude business persons from regulatoryactivity within the CSR area. According to article 17 it is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> states to establish the legalframework.Next to international organizations, also business associations are active in regulating CSR. TheInternational Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization, associating governments as well as business entities,adopted in 2010 a new Social Responsibility st<strong>and</strong>ard, the ISO 26000. It addresses the issue <strong>of</strong>spreading CSR performance throughout business networks by various modes. From the s<strong>of</strong>ter,motivating ones, it uses words as “promote” (Clause 4.4.) or “encourage” (Clause 6.4.3.2.). But theoverall approach <strong>of</strong> ISO 26000 seems to be more than mere vague motivation for the CSR performance.The instrument acknowledges companies’ capability <strong>of</strong> political <strong>and</strong> regulatory involvement within theCSR area, which means that companies are expected to use their leverage to positively influence theregulatory environment <strong>of</strong> CSR <strong>and</strong> must refrain from decisions <strong>and</strong> activities that could have negativedirect effects on the same (Clause 6.6.6.). The ISO 26000 thus expects from companies to get activelyinvolved in motivating their business partners towards socially responsible behavior, requests them toenforce existing rules at least in the sense that they should avoid <strong>and</strong> influence their business partners toavoid any negative impacts, <strong>and</strong> assign them the right to engage in regulation <strong>development</strong>.Business Social Compliance Initiative, a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization, issued a Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct, which isopen to be joined by companies <strong>and</strong> other institutions. The Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct states that by signing itentities commit themselves to take appropriate measures to ensure “implementation <strong>and</strong> compliance”with the rules within their “sphere <strong>of</strong> influence”. Although the BSCI Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct does not provide adefinition <strong>of</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> influence either, the request to use contracting as one <strong>of</strong> the appropriate measurescan be derived from its text <strong>and</strong>, especially, from the Declaration <strong>of</strong> Liability Regarding Compliance withthe BSCI Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct (Declaration) that must be signed by entities when becoming a BSCI member.In the Declaration, entities undertake to ensure that all <strong>of</strong> their subcontractors will observe the samest<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> to make compliance with social st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> the BSCI Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct a condition <strong>of</strong> alltheir contracts. Non-compliance <strong>of</strong> a subcontractor must be sanctioned by termination <strong>of</strong> therelationship, if the parties cannot find another suitable solution. The BSCI thus seems to go the furthestwith the request <strong>of</strong> incorporating SCCs into business contracts.379

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!