10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2. Material FootprintThe natural resource consumption <strong>of</strong> the decent reference minimum budgets was calculated as materialfootprint (see Lettenmeier et al., 2009). The material footprint is based on the MIPS concept that hasproved to function as a holistic, useful, reliable <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>able measure for natural resourceconsumption, thus serving also as a central indicator for ecological sustainability (e.g. Schmidt-Bleek,2003; 2009; Rohn et al., 2010). The method considers the whole life cycle <strong>of</strong> products <strong>and</strong> activities <strong>and</strong>includes direct resource use (used extraction) as well as indirect resource use (unused extraction, seeGliljum et al., 2009; Aachener Stiftung, 2010). In this paper, the resource consumption is given in massunits <strong>of</strong> TMR (total material requirement, i.e. the sum <strong>of</strong> abiotic <strong>and</strong> biotic resource consumption plusthe top soil erosion in agriculture <strong>and</strong> forestry, see Ritth<strong>of</strong>f et al., 2002).The calculation <strong>of</strong> the natural resource consumption <strong>of</strong> the decent minimum reference budgets wasdone on the basis <strong>of</strong> the yearly consumption <strong>of</strong> the households defined. Food was integrated on a twoweeks’ diet basis defined by the consumers (see section 4.1). Household objects <strong>and</strong> appliances werecalculated on a stock basis including service life estimations, both defined by the consumer panel.Material footprint calculation is done by multiplying the direct resource consumption or other input(e.g. electricity or transportation) with a material intensity factor specific for each input (see Lettenmeieret al., 2009). Most <strong>of</strong> the material intensity factors used for calculation the material footprints weretaken from Kotakorpi et al. (2008), Lähteenoja et al. (2006) <strong>and</strong> Lettenmeier et al. (2009). In addition,some coefficients, e.g. for health care <strong>and</strong> hairdressing, were calculated in this study. In some cases (e.g.daily mobility by public transport) the decent minimum reference budgets were not sufficient forcalculating resource consumption. In these cases, statistics <strong>and</strong> literature-based estimations were used,e.g. data from the National Travel Survey (WSP LT Consultants, 2006) to estimate transport distances.4. Results: The material footprint <strong>of</strong> the decent minimum referencebudgetsThe material footprint <strong>of</strong> all decent minimum reference budgets is appr. 20 tonnes per person in a year(Figure 1). The family has the highest material footprint per person (23.6 tonnes per year) <strong>and</strong> thewoman under 45 years <strong>of</strong> age the lowest (19.8 tonnes per year). Thus, the material footprint <strong>of</strong> all decentminimum reference budgets is roughly half <strong>of</strong> the one <strong>of</strong> an average Finn according to Kotakorpi et al.(2008).207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!