10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

developed countries but not globally. The <strong>of</strong>f-shoring would not be possible without cost efficienttransport, particularly shipping as a part <strong>of</strong> global trade. Cost efficient transport is generally alsoenvironmentally efficient, but this leads to a rebound effect: increasing the efficiency <strong>of</strong> transportoperations decreases the environmental impacts <strong>and</strong> costs, which enables longer transport in order togain from e.g. lower labour costs, which in turn increases the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> transport.In order to prevent the rebound effect, it has been proposed that the freight transport should fullyinternalize the external costs it is responsible for. However, the rebound effect mainly occurs on a globalscale <strong>and</strong> therefore actions against it are difficult to take. On a national scale a study in the UK by Piecyk& McKinnon (2007) revealed that lorries already more than cover their external costs to theinfrastructure <strong>and</strong> the environment.3. Framework for the analysisThe widely accepted framework for analyzing the relationships between the economy <strong>and</strong> road freighttransport was introduced by McKinnon & Woodburn (1996) <strong>and</strong> further enhanced in a wide Europeanresearch on the subject (REDEFINE 1999). Cooper et al. (1998) extended the framework to include theenvironmental effects <strong>and</strong> McKinnon (2010) introduced also monetary valuation <strong>of</strong> the environmentaleffects for determining the external costs <strong>of</strong> logistics operations. The basic structure <strong>of</strong> the frameworkhas, however, remained the same. For this study, the framework, presented in Figure 1, is slightly alteredby including various determinants for the key ratios, <strong>and</strong> is similar to the one presented in Liimatainen<strong>and</strong> Pöllänen (2010). Monetary valuation <strong>and</strong> other environmental effects than energy consumption <strong>and</strong>CO 2 emissions are omitted from our framework as we focus on acquiring in-depth information <strong>and</strong>projections on energy efficiency <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions.438

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!