10.07.2015 Views

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

trends and future of sustainable development - TransEco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2.Material footprint in the different consumption components <strong>of</strong> three decent minimumreference budgets.5. Discussion <strong>and</strong> conclusionsWhen the decent minimum reference budgets are compared to the households studied by Kotakorpi etal. (2008), their material footprint per person per year is relatively low. In Kotakorpi et al. (2008) onlyseven out <strong>of</strong> 27 household studied have a material footprint <strong>of</strong> 20 tonnes or lower <strong>and</strong> there are sixhouseholds with a material footprint <strong>of</strong> more than 50 tonnes per person.Out <strong>of</strong> the decent minimum reference budgets, the family has the greatest material footprint perperson (23.6 tonnes). This differs from the results <strong>of</strong> Kotakorpi et al. (2008) where families tend to havesmaller material footprints than single or couple households. The reason is that the consumer panelassumed that the decent minimum reference budget <strong>of</strong> a family should include a car whereas the otherhouseholds are supposed to be car-free. The use <strong>of</strong> the car raises the material footprint <strong>of</strong> both dailymobility <strong>and</strong> leisure time (incl. tourism) above the level <strong>of</strong> the other household types.The reference budgets describing the socio-economical minimum illustrate the level <strong>of</strong> consumptionthat allows a household to fulfil all basic needs <strong>and</strong> participate in society. The material footprint due tothe decent minimum reference budget is approximately half <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> an average Finn. This means thatthe present average material footprint <strong>of</strong> households can be halved while still keeping the possibility <strong>of</strong>achieving a decent lifestyle. This is a remarkable potential for making consumption more <strong>sustainable</strong>.In order to operationalize the potential for decreasing the material footprint, one must have a closerlook at the different consumption components. Housing is the most resource-consuming consumptioncomponent <strong>of</strong> the decent minimum reference budgets (despite in the family reference budget). This isdue to the fact that housing always needs some infrastructure <strong>and</strong> as the private living space wasregarded as an important part <strong>of</strong> decent housing the amount <strong>of</strong> living space is relatively high in the209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!