10.07.2015 Views

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHECHNYAN TERRORISM • 101On 1 October 1999 Russia began what has been described as its“second Chechnyan” war, ostensibly to destroy terrorist trainingcamps and to root terrorism out <strong>of</strong> the Caucasus region. Some observersbelieve that the government <strong>of</strong> Boris Yeltsin was deliberatelyplaying up Russian national feelings and resentments over the disastrous1994–1996 war to create a mood <strong>of</strong> national unity and supportfor his government that would help his electoral coalition in the 19December 1999 parliamentary elections. In fact, both the allegedChechen bombings within Russia occurring that autumn and thesecond <strong>of</strong>fensive late in 1999 were to help Boris Yeltsin’s successor,Vladimir Vladimirovitch Putin, to bolster his image as a hard-linedefender <strong>of</strong> Russian nationalist values prior to the presidential electionsin Russia. In late December 1999 Russian troops had succeededin occupying much <strong>of</strong> Chechnya and captured Grozny on 6 February2000 following a two-month siege. In the Russian presidentialelection <strong>of</strong> 26 March 2000, Putin won a majority <strong>of</strong> 53 percent, anelectoral mandate achieved in part by public perceptions <strong>of</strong> his effectivenessin suppressing the Chechen revolt.The main external support for the Chechen extremists appears tocome from the estimated 15,000-strong “Afghans,” those Islamicveteran volunteers who came from outside Afghanistan to help theMujahideen fight the Soviet occupation in that country and whohave since then dispersed throughout the Muslim world, seekingto promote Islamist insurgencies elsewhere, including Chechnya.However, the Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran, which found itself atodds with the Sunni Wahhabi-dominated “Afghans” and with theWahhabi-dominated Taliban regime in Afghanistan, had its owngeopolitical reasons to support Russia in its attempts to contain thespread <strong>of</strong> Wahhabi-style fundamentalism in the Caucasus region.Azerbaijan, with its more secularized society and predominantlyShi’ite Muslim culture, has not shown itself inclined to supportthe Chechens in this conflict with Russia. Georgia, however, whichearlier had suffered from a Russian-backed secessionist movementamong the Abkhazians, in effect gave passive support to Chechenrebels by allowing them to use the Pankisi Gorge area as a stagingarea for attacks within Russian territory and by allowing them toset up <strong>of</strong>fices in Tbilisi. Russia later accused Georgia <strong>of</strong> supplyingthe Chechens with some <strong>of</strong> its 146 or so Igla shoulder-held antiaircraftmissiles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!