10.07.2015 Views

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lviii • INTRODUCTIONThe revolutionary is a doomed man. He has no interests <strong>of</strong> his own, noaffairs, no attachments, no belongings, not even a name. Everything inhim is absorbed by a single thought, a single passion—the revolution. . . .The revolutionary enters into the world <strong>of</strong> the state, <strong>of</strong> class, <strong>of</strong> so-calledculture, and lives in it only because he has faith in its speedy and totaldestruction. He is not a revolutionary if he feels pity for anything in thisworld. If he is able to, he must face the annihilation <strong>of</strong> a situation—everythingand everyone must be equally odious to him. All the worse forhim if he has family and loved ones in this world; he is no revolutionaryif he can stay his hand. 12Modern terrorist tactics also developed during this period. The NarodnayaVolya (People’s Will) organization employed dynamite andbombings in its assassination campaigns against the <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> theTsarist regime. During this period, the followers <strong>of</strong> anarchism furtherdeveloped terrorism as a weapon <strong>of</strong> propaganda and communication.The leading advocate <strong>of</strong> anarchism, Mikhail Bakunin, recognized thatviolence sent a potent message to both allies and enemies. This message,through the medium <strong>of</strong> violence called “propaganda by the deed,”is still practiced today before the lens <strong>of</strong> the video camera.The impact <strong>of</strong> technology on communications and control <strong>of</strong> informationheightened the capacity <strong>of</strong> those who used terrorism as a form <strong>of</strong>propaganda not only to convey a message but, more ominously, to exert asocial and political control over subject populations that went far beyondthe capability <strong>of</strong> the most repressive dictators <strong>of</strong> the past. The penetrationand consequent control <strong>of</strong> all levels <strong>of</strong> political, social, and economic lifeby a repressive regime led to the development <strong>of</strong> the modern totalitarianstate. The reign <strong>of</strong> terror pioneered by the French revolution was expandedwith murderous efficiency by Stalin through the massive purgesand show trials <strong>of</strong> the 1920s and 1930s and reached its zenith in the genocideattempted under the <strong>Third</strong> Reich with its concentration camps andcrematoria. This murderous combination <strong>of</strong> technology and attendant organizationalcapabilities led to the maturation <strong>of</strong> “terrorism from above.”Modern state terrorism had come <strong>of</strong> age, aptly defined thus: “State terrorismcan be seen as a method <strong>of</strong> rule whereby some groups <strong>of</strong> people arevictimized with great brutality, and more or less arbitrarily by the state,or state-supported actors, so that others who have reason to identify withthose murdered, will despair, obey, or comply. Its main instruments aresummary arrest and incarceration without trial, torture, political murder,disappearances, and concentration camps.” 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!