10.07.2015 Views

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

426 • MILITIA MOVEMENTdistinct from the regular armed forces and National Guard. Suchunits can be created and regulated by state law but many states, suchas New Hampshire, specifically prohibit privately formed militias orother associations from becoming registered as state defense forces.Therefore, under existing federal and state laws, the self-formed militiasare no more than unauthorized, autonomous, voluntary paramilitaryorganizations, and some states have declared them to be subjectto regulation while others have banned them altogether.These militias are largely autonomous and lack any hierarchicalrelationship, coordination, or working unity. On the other hand, suchmilitias can spin <strong>of</strong>f “cells” <strong>of</strong> more committed extremist activists whomay strike out on their own in the name <strong>of</strong> leaderless resistance.Several explanations have been <strong>of</strong>fered for the rise <strong>of</strong> the militiamovement: First, there has been a popular backlash in the westernUnited States against environmentalism and federal management <strong>of</strong>western public lands impacting the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> ranchers, miners,and loggers, most <strong>of</strong> whom are white males. Second, the existence <strong>of</strong>prior Christian patriot, tax protestor, and white supremacist groups inthe midwestern and western United States provided a cadre <strong>of</strong> likemindedpeople able to create new militia groups modeled after theseolder organizations. <strong>Third</strong>, a rise in working-class frustrations may alsobe at work: blue-collar white male workers lost 15 percent <strong>of</strong> their realincome in the period 1980–2000, while women and members <strong>of</strong> ethnicminority groups have experienced relative gains. Such white males seethemselves excluded and passed over by affirmative action laws andtheir traditional positions as heads <strong>of</strong> households weakened by lawspunishing spousal abuse and favoring divorced women in matters <strong>of</strong>alimony, child custody disputes, and mandatory child support.Thus the militia movement may also be a reaction to a growingidentity politics in the United States in which women, ethnic groups,and specialized lifestyle groups seek empowerment <strong>of</strong> their own respectivegroups through civil advocacy and claims <strong>of</strong> past victimization.White males, who are <strong>of</strong>ten castigated as the victimizers <strong>of</strong> thesegroups, find the militia movement a ready-made vehicle to pursuetheir own version <strong>of</strong> identity politics. Finally, one should note thevoiced concerns <strong>of</strong> militia movement members that the FBI raids atRuby Ridge in August 1992 and Waco in April 1993, and the passage<strong>of</strong> several federal gun-control bills, presage a rise in authoritarianismon the part <strong>of</strong> the national government. While such beliefs strike

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!