10.07.2015 Views

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 • EXTRADITIONthe rights <strong>of</strong> due process <strong>of</strong> such people. The two main internationalconventions are the Convention Relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees(28 July 1951) and the Protocol Relating to the Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees (31January 1967). These define as a refugee anyone who flees to anothercountry to avoid persecution due to his or her race, religion, nationality,ethnic affiliation, or political opinion and who cannot secure legalprotection from such persecution in the country from which he or sheis fleeing. Under such circumstances, even if the refugee has enteredthe signatory nation illegally, that nation cannot deport the refugeeback to the country from which he or she fled.This protection from deportation to the nation <strong>of</strong> origin is incorporatedin the United States Refugee Act <strong>of</strong> 1980. U.S. authoritiescan resort to exclusion or deportation in the case <strong>of</strong> illegal alienswhose claim <strong>of</strong> persecution is doubtful, but the choice <strong>of</strong> exclusioncan apply only to immigrants who are not yet legally admitted tothe jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the United States. Those immigrants who haveentered the land or maritime borders <strong>of</strong> the United States but not yetreported to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) inspectionstation can be considered subject to exclusion. The difference isthat in deportation proceedings the burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is on the governmentto prove that the alien is worthy <strong>of</strong> deportation. By contrast,in exclusion proceedings the burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is on the alien, withthe exception being returning resident aliens, to establish his or heradmissibility. In cases where the alien would face “a well-groundedfear” <strong>of</strong> certain persecution for the grounds cited earlier, the political<strong>of</strong>fense exception would establish admissibility. One significantdifference in the outcome <strong>of</strong> a deportation or exclusion proceedingis that if exclusion is indicated then the alien must be returned to thecountry <strong>of</strong> origin, whereas if deportation is determined then the alienmay choose to which country to go.Prior to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the U.S. StateDepartment maintained lists <strong>of</strong> known and suspected members <strong>of</strong>foreign terrorist organizations who were to be excluded from admissionto the United States. In the event that such people actuallyentered the United States, to avoid deportation they <strong>of</strong>ten relied onthe claim under the political <strong>of</strong>fense exception that they would facepersecution in their homelands. In the wake <strong>of</strong> the convictions <strong>of</strong>the World Trade Center bombers, the Antiterrorism and EffectiveDeath Penalty Act <strong>of</strong> 1996 and the Illegal Immigration Reform and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!