10.07.2015 Views

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

Historical Dictionary of Terrorism Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 • HOSTAGE TAKINGforce, which were relaxed in the war against drugs, have been furtherlessened to fight the war on terrorism. This expansion <strong>of</strong> the direct role<strong>of</strong> the military emphasizes a direct operational role for the military, asopposed to a supportive role on behalf <strong>of</strong> civilian law enforcement.This military involvement is likely to expand on the plea that it will beessential to counter the threats <strong>of</strong> mass terrorism or its consequenceswithin the United States. The jurisdictional questions associated withthe changing roles <strong>of</strong> the military are also mirrored in the changing role<strong>of</strong> the police and other law enforcement agencies in the United Statesand other nations. National and local police forces are becoming moremilitarized as they develop armed capabilities that can be used in moreaggressive actions to protect public order and security. Whereas liberaldemocracies formerly distinguished clearly between domestic policeenforcement, in which minimal force is used to apprehend suspects, andmilitary actions, in which maximum force is used to destroy the enemyforces, now there is an increasing “mission blur” between the roles <strong>of</strong>the police and the military in democratic societies.“Homeland security” refers principally to the civilian componentfor protecting internal security from man-made or natural disasters,while the notion <strong>of</strong> “homeland defense” or “civil defense” refers tothe military component used in protecting internal security. Homelanddefense or civil defense is generally directed to preventing ormitigating the actions <strong>of</strong> an external enemy in a wartime environmentand would also involve the military in defending internal securityand maintaining continuity <strong>of</strong> government programs in the event <strong>of</strong> apossible collapse <strong>of</strong> civil government. Since such enforcement powerswould at times be directed against a government’s own citizensand civilian authorities, this raises serious questions about changingcivil/military relations in democratic societies.HOSTAGE TAKING. See KIDNAPPING.HOSTAGE-TAKING ACT. The Act for the Prevention and Punishment<strong>of</strong> the Crime <strong>of</strong> Hostage-Taking (Title 18 U.S. Code, Section 1203)was enacted on October 1984, ostensibly to implement the United NationsInternational Convention against the Taking <strong>of</strong> Hostages, adoptedby the General Assembly on 17 December 1979. This act makes theseizure <strong>of</strong> a U.S. national anywhere in the world a crime, as well as anyhostage taking directed against the U.S. government or any incident inwhich hostages taken are U.S. nationals. This act granted the FederalBureau <strong>of</strong> Investigation (FBI) powers <strong>of</strong> extraterritorial investigation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!