The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

176 NATIONAL DEFENCE AND EUROPEAN COOPERATIONTable 9.2. Major weapon deliveries from the Nordic countries in the period1993–2003The percentage of total major arms exports accounted for by each category are calculated fromthe SIPRI trend-indicator value and rounded. Recipients accounting for more than 10% of thevalue of total arms supplied are shown.Major arms categories (%)ArmouredMain recipientsSupplier Aircraft vehicles Artillery Missiles Radars Ships (% of exports)Denmark 4 – 1 – – 95 USA (88)Finland 21 62 10 – – 7 Sweden (29)Netherlands (18)Norway (15)Mexico (11)Norway
HARDWARE POLITICS 177of international defence industrial cooperation is evidenced by 38 bilateralpermissions with the UK, Germany and France (UK 15, Germany 12 andFrance 11) and 20 bilateral permissions with the USA in the 11-year period1993–2003. These four countries accounted for 50 per cent of all new Swedishbilateral permissions for defence cooperation over this period, compared with18 Swedish permissions (or 15 per cent) for defence cooperation with Nordiccountries (see table 9.1 above).Sweden has also moved from bilateral to multilateral defence industrialcooperation, including R&D. While such cooperation has been common forDenmark and Norway as a result of their NATO membership, it was formallyaccepted as a Swedish policy as recently as 1992. 29 The first officially registeredSwedish permission for multilateral cooperation was with France andGermany in 2002, involving the manufacture of front fuselages for the NH90helicopter. It was followed by a permission in 2003 to establish the Finnish–French–Swedish company EURENCO. NORDAC has studied several non-Nordic major weapon systems as potential subjects for common or jointprocurement and maintenance or support arrangements, such as the GermanLeopard 2A4 battle tank, the US C-130 transport aircraft and the US AGM-114Hellfire anti-tank missile. US equipment stands out among the foreign majorsystems that were considered. As a consequence, non-Nordic alternatives forjoint maintenance and support were ultimately preferred for some of theseweapons and it seems to have been easier to reach full Nordic agreement inthese cases; for instance, on using the existing ‘user club’ for the AIM-120AMRAAM air-to-air missile and on joining the NATO TOW anti-tank missilepartnership group rather than attempting purely Nordic support of these missiles.Looking at foreign company shareholdings, the USA as a full or part owner isnot as visible in Nordic companies as it is in other European arms producers. 30Sweden again stands out as the Nordic country where the internationalization ofthe defence industrial base has been most rapid and extensive. The five largestSwedish defence companies are partly or wholly foreign owned (see table 9.3).In 2004 BAE Systems acquired Alvis, meaning that BAE Systems became notonly a shareholder in Saab but also the owner of Hägglunds. 31 Bofors Defencewas wholly owned by the US company United Defense, which itself wasacquired by BAE Systems in 2005. 3229 Lag 1992:1300 om krigsmateriel [Law 1992:1300 on war equipment], Swedish Ministry for ForeignAffairs, Stockholm, 1992. An English translation is available at URL .30 See Sköns, E., Bauer, S. and Surry, E., ‘Arms production’, SIPRI Yearbook 2004 (note 25),pp. 389–409.31 ‘Alvis: BAE Systems’ counter-bid accepted’, Defence News Analysis, issue 04/22 (7 June 2004),p. 1; and ‘BAE Systems surprises Alvis—and GD—to add AFVs to the portfolio’, Jane’s Defence Industry,vol. 21, no. 7 (July 2004), p. 1.32 See also Hagelin, B., ‘Swedish for how long? The nation’s defence industry in an international context’,eds A. Erikson and J. Hallenberg, The Changing European Defence Industry Sector: Consequencesfor Sweden?, SI Acta B no. 12 (Försvarshögskolan: Stockholm, 2000).
Page 1 and 2:
THE NORDICCOUNTRIES ANDTHE EUROPEAN
Page 3 and 4:
Alyson J. K. Bailes (United Kingdom
Page 5 and 6:
The Nordic Countries andthe Europea
Page 7 and 8:
The Nordic Countries andthe Europea
Page 9 and 10:
ContentsPrefacexiiAbbreviations and
Page 11 and 12:
CONTENTSII. The European security c
Page 13 and 14:
CONTENTSII. The small arms and ligh
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTSII. Iceland and the emergen
Page 17:
PREFACEThe conference on the Nordic
Page 20 and 21:
2 THE NORDIC COUNTRIES AND THE ESDP
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
10 THE NORDIC COUNTRIES AND THE ESD
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 47 and 48:
Editor’s remarksGunilla HerolfPar
Page 49 and 50:
EDITOR’S REMARKS 31which the vari
Page 51 and 52:
EDITOR’S REMARKS 33mark as well s
Page 53 and 54:
EDITOR’S REMARKS 35The Europeaniz
Page 55 and 56:
1. Denmark and the European Securit
Page 57 and 58:
DENMARK AND THE ESDP 39European def
Page 59 and 60:
DENMARK AND THE ESDP 41safely leave
Page 61 and 62:
DENMARK AND THE ESDP 43motions to t
Page 63 and 64:
DENMARK AND THE ESDP 45effective
Page 65 and 66:
DENMARK AND THE ESDP 47connected an
Page 70 and 71:
52 INSTITUTIONAL AND NATIONAL POLIT
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
100 INSTITUTIONAL AND NATIONAL POLI
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 129:
Part IINational defence and Europea
Page 132 and 133:
114 THE BROADER DIMENSIONS OF SECUR
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
6. The impact of EU capability targ
Page 139 and 140:
CAPABILITY TARGETS AND OPERATIONAL
Page 141 and 142:
CAPABILITY TARGETS AND OPERATIONAL
Page 143 and 144: CAPABILITY TARGETS AND OPERATIONAL
Page 159 and 160: 7. The impact of EU capability targ
Page 161 and 162: THE CASE OF SWEDEN 143Government ha
Page 163 and 164: THE CASE OF SWEDEN 145immediate reg
Page 165 and 166: THE CASE OF SWEDEN 147SAF Headquart
Page 167 and 168: THE CASE OF SWEDEN 149the navy will
Page 169 and 170: ‘NOT ONLY, BUT ALSO NORDIC’ 151
Page 185 and 186: 9. Hardware politics, ‘hard polit
Page 187 and 188: HARDWARE POLITICS 169Sweden’s sec
Page 189 and 190: HARDWARE POLITICS 171the exploitati
Page 191 and 192: HARDWARE POLITICS 173share of Finla
Page 193: HARDWARE POLITICS 175and procuremen
Page 197 and 198: HARDWARE POLITICS 179reluctant to a
Page 199 and 200: HARDWARE POLITICS 181EU ambitions a
Page 201 and 202: HARDWARE POLITICS 183Nordic armamen
Page 203 and 204: 10. The Nordic attitude to and role
Page 205 and 206: DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL COLLABORATION 18
Page 211: Part IIINordic handling of the broa
Page 214 and 215: 196 THE BROADER DIMENSIONS OF SECUR
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
13. The Nordic countries and conven
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
14. Nordic nuclear non-proliferatio
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
16. Muddling through: how the EU is
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 317:
Editor’s remarksAlyson J. K. Bail
Page 320 and 321:
302 THE NORDIC COUNTRIES, THEIR REG
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
20. Iceland and the European Securi
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
22. The Baltic states and security
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
23. Baltic perspectives on the Euro
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 411 and 412:
AppendixExtracts from the Treaty Es
Page 413 and 414:
ments, to promote measures to satis
Page 415 and 416:
(c) strengthening systematic cooper
Page 417 and 418:
Article III-303The Union may conclu
Page 419 and 420:
shall carry out its tasks in liaiso
Page 421 and 422:
EU CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY 403enhance
Page 423 and 424:
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 405ning, Det 21.
Page 425 and 426:
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 407Karlis Neretni
Page 427 and 428:
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 409her publicatio
Page 429 and 430:
INDEX 411Atlanticism 364banking 357
Page 431 and 432:
INDEX 413Kosovo and 45Left Socialis
Page 433 and 434:
INDEX 415Counter-Terrorism Coordina
Page 435 and 436:
attle group 154, 181Central Union o
Page 437 and 438:
INDEX 419Iceland Defense Force 328,
Page 439 and 440:
INDEX 421Washington Declaration (19
Page 441 and 442:
INDEX 423NPT (Non-Proliferation Tre
Page 443 and 444:
ESDP and 12, 16, 19, 24, 54-55, 59,
Page 445:
INDEX 427Vienna Documents 236Viking
show all

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?