10.07.2015 Views

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NORDIC NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION POLICIES 253<strong>Nordic</strong> countries Denmark, Finl<strong>and</strong>, Norway <strong>and</strong> Sweden are four such states. 3<strong>The</strong>y could, most probably, have developed nuclear weapons, but <strong>the</strong>y wisely<strong>and</strong> for different reasons ei<strong>the</strong>r never considered <strong>the</strong> option (Denmark <strong>and</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong>)or chose to forgo it (Norway <strong>and</strong> Sweden). Instead, <strong>the</strong>y have invested alot of capital in convincing o<strong>the</strong>rs to do <strong>the</strong> same.II. Underlying factors in <strong>the</strong> formation of <strong>Nordic</strong> nuclearnon-proliferation policiesIt may seem that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> countries are similar or even identical when itcomes to <strong>the</strong>ir nuclear non-proliferation policies. <strong>The</strong>re are good reasons forbelieving this, given that all four countries are long-st<strong>and</strong>ing supporters of <strong>the</strong>UN <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> development of international law <strong>and</strong> given that <strong>the</strong>y have a generalpreference for rule-based, multilateral solutions to international problems.A study of <strong>the</strong>ir voting record—for example, in <strong>the</strong> First Committee of <strong>the</strong> UNGeneral Assembly, 4 where inter alia nuclear weapon issues are discussed—streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong> perception that <strong>the</strong>y generally share <strong>the</strong> same opinions. However,<strong>the</strong> four states have different points of departure as regards some of <strong>the</strong>background factors that influence <strong>the</strong>ir political choices <strong>and</strong> priorities. <strong>The</strong> mostsalient factors are: (a) security policy choices—alliance membership versusneutrality; (b) <strong>the</strong> choice to use or not to use nuclear power as a source ofenergy; <strong>and</strong> (c) <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>re has been a tradition of nuclear weaponissues influencing foreign policy thinking (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditions of openness or,conversely, of elite decision making that surround <strong>the</strong> issues). It is difficult toseparate <strong>the</strong>se factors <strong>and</strong> to a certain extent <strong>the</strong>y influence each o<strong>the</strong>r.<strong>The</strong> policies of each of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> states have been shaped by <strong>the</strong>se choices<strong>and</strong> traditions, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have developed over decades to meet specific nationalrequirements <strong>and</strong> preconditions. <strong>The</strong> results of this development determinewhat each state has brought <strong>and</strong> can still bring into <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union policycontext. Denmark has been a member of <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Community/EU since1973, <strong>and</strong> it has a long tradition of participation in EU policy work in <strong>the</strong>framework of <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Political Cooperation, which started in an informalmanner in <strong>the</strong> early 1970s. 5 Finl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Sweden participated in this process in<strong>the</strong> early 1990s during <strong>the</strong>ir membership negotiations <strong>and</strong> became full membersin 1995, by which time <strong>the</strong> EU’s foreign policy process had been formalized as<strong>the</strong> Common Foreign <strong>and</strong> <strong>Security</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> in Article J of <strong>the</strong> 1992 Treaty of3 Icel<strong>and</strong> is not considered in this chapter.4 <strong>The</strong> First Committee of <strong>the</strong> UN General Assembly, which convenes each autumn, is responsible forquestions of disarmament <strong>and</strong> international security. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> states have a long-st<strong>and</strong>ing practice ofcoordinating <strong>the</strong>ir positions on <strong>the</strong>se <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r issues at <strong>the</strong> UN.5 <strong>The</strong> <strong>European</strong> Political Cooperation was not formalized until <strong>the</strong> 1987 Single <strong>European</strong> Act. See URL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!