10.07.2015 Views

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ÅLAND IN EUROPEAN SECURITY POLICY 355neutralized status. In reference to this circumstance, <strong>the</strong> Ål<strong>and</strong> Government hasstated that, even if Finl<strong>and</strong> were to consider membership of a defence union,<strong>the</strong>re is no reason for <strong>the</strong> issue of Ål<strong>and</strong>’s demilitarization to be on <strong>the</strong> agenda.<strong>The</strong> Ål<strong>and</strong> Government’s faith in <strong>the</strong> future of <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>s’ demilitarization <strong>and</strong>neutralization within a Finl<strong>and</strong> that is a member of <strong>the</strong> EU has been reinforcedby <strong>the</strong> recognition of Ål<strong>and</strong>’s status during <strong>the</strong> country’s EU membershipnegotiations.<strong>The</strong> Finnish Government has thus far shown no inclination to challenge <strong>the</strong>Ål<strong>and</strong>ers’ position. <strong>The</strong> strongest dem<strong>and</strong>s for change in Ål<strong>and</strong>’s status havecome from certain Finnish military personalities <strong>and</strong> commentators who haveseen problems in Ål<strong>and</strong>’s demilitarization. 18 <strong>The</strong>ir criticism has been based onarguments about Ål<strong>and</strong>’s increased strategic importance <strong>and</strong> increased vulnerabilityin <strong>the</strong> light of modern weapon technology. It has also been argued thatFinl<strong>and</strong> should take advantage of <strong>the</strong> current good political atmosphere in <strong>the</strong>Baltic Sea region in order to strive for a change.However, not even in today’s peaceful situation can Ål<strong>and</strong>’s status be a questionof concern only to Finl<strong>and</strong>. Ål<strong>and</strong>’s special position in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>European</strong>security is still a matter of concern to several countries around <strong>the</strong> BalticSea <strong>and</strong> beyond. <strong>The</strong> considerable attention given to <strong>the</strong> Ål<strong>and</strong> question over<strong>the</strong> years, from <strong>the</strong> debate in <strong>the</strong> League of Nations in <strong>the</strong> early 20th century to<strong>the</strong> current debate, demonstrates this; <strong>and</strong> it is an attention that would surely bebound to increase were ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> more radical scenarios discussed above—a‘real’ defence community in <strong>the</strong> EU or Finnish entry to NATO—to loom on <strong>the</strong>horizon.18 Hannikainen refers to this discussion, which was initiated in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s. E.g., Major MikkoTaavitsainen has argued that Finl<strong>and</strong> should attempt to end Ål<strong>and</strong>’s demilitarization. Both CommodoreJan Klenberg (Chief of <strong>Defence</strong> in 1990–94) <strong>and</strong> General Gustav Hägglund (Chief of <strong>Defence</strong> in 1994–2001) have referred to <strong>the</strong> increased strategic importance of Ål<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Baltic Sea. Hannikainen (note 6),pp. 627–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!