12.07.2015 Views

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 APOSTOLICITY, OR PETER's PRIMACY.the Church, that is, Christianity, built ? On Jesus Christ,replies the apostle.If these words do not definitely settlethat question, we despair of words being found capable ofsettling it. " It is here," says Calvin, " abundantly evidenton what rock it is that the Church is built." Bellarmine,unable to meet this plain testimony, attempts to turn aside<strong>its</strong> ^orce by saying, that it is granted that Christ is the primaryfoundation of the Church, but that Peter is the foundationof the Church in the room of Christ, or as Christ'svicar ; <strong>and</strong> that it is proper to speak of the Church as immediately<strong>and</strong> literally built upon Peter.* Now, no enlightenedProtestant affirms that Romanists make Peter the sole<strong>and</strong> primary author of Christianity, or that they utterly ignorethe person <strong>and</strong> work of the Saviour :admit, is regarding vicarship.But to make Peter the foundationof the Church inthe question, theythe room of Christ, or as Christ'svicar, is just to make him the foundation of the Church.To devolve upon a second party theimmediate <strong>and</strong> literalgovernment of the realm, would be a virtual dethronementof the real monarch, more especially if the party in questionbad no patent of investiture to exhibit. <strong>The</strong> more enlightenedheathens willingly allowed the existence <strong>and</strong> supremacyof an infiniteroom.<strong>and</strong> invisible Being, only they put idols in hisRomanists have dealt in the same way by the divinefoundation of the Church . reserving the empty name toOnrist, they have put him aside, <strong>and</strong> substituted another.<strong>The</strong> Bible furnishes not a tittle of evidence that the personof Peter can in any sense, or to any extent, be denominatedthe foundation.Nay, it explicitly asserts that Christ is thatfoundation, to the exclusion of all participation on the partof any one. " Other foundation can no man lay than thatwhich is Jesus Christ."To the same mp ort is the passage, " And are built uponis laid,the foundation of the apostles <strong>and</strong> prophets, Jesus Christhimself being the chief corner-stone."-f-Romanists some-* De Roman. Pont. lib. i. cap. x. + Ephesians, ii. 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!