12.07.2015 Views

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

The-papacy-its-history-dogmas-genius-and-prospects-wylie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE " TWELVE FOUNDATIONS. 223times quote this passage, as if it favoured their theory ofChrist being the primary foundation <strong>and</strong> Peter the immediatefoundation of the Church. <strong>The</strong> passage overthrowsthis view. Romanists must admit that there are but twosenses which can bo put upon the words " the foundation ofthe apostles <strong>and</strong> prophets ;" they can mean only the personsof the apostles <strong>and</strong> prophets, or the doctrine of the apostles<strong>and</strong> prophets ; but either sense is opposed to the Romanisttheory.If it be said that by the words " the foundation ofthe apostles <strong>and</strong> prophets" is meant their persons, whatthen becomes of Peter's primacy ? He appears here simplyas one of the twelve ; nay, his name is not seen at all ; <strong>and</strong>no hint is given that one is superior to another. If personsave here meant, then all the twelve are foundations; <strong>and</strong>,on the doctrine of transmission, each of the twelve ouo-ht tohave his representative ; we ought to have not only a Peter,but a James, a John, <strong>and</strong> a Paul in the world. Nay, we oughtto have an Isaiah, a Jeremiah, an Ezekiel, <strong>and</strong> others also;for with the apostles of theNew are joined the prophets ofthe Old Testament. If it be said that by " the foundationof the apostles <strong>and</strong> prophets'" we are to underst<strong>and</strong> theirdoctrines, this is just what we maintain, <strong>and</strong> is but anotherway of stating that Christ is the foundation.** It is well remarked by Spanheini, in his admirable commentary onMatthew, xvi. 18, which contains the germ of almost all that has beenwritten since on this famous passage, that not only are the twelve apostlesgrouped together when spoken of as foundations, but they are mentionedsingly also, as well as Peter. " Nee tantura omnes simul sumpti, sedet singuU, seque ac Petrus totidem fundamenta. Hinc Bifiixiei iuhxa, respondentesroig ^uhxa Atoo-toXoi;" (Apoc. xxi. 14.) " Et ratio plana,quia singuli aeque ac Petrus, nullo discrimiue habito, fundarunt universalimissione Christianam ecclesiam quaa domus et civitas Dei." (SpanhemiiVindiciae Biblicoe, lib. ii. loc. xxviii."We are not aware that it has ever been remarked that the apocalypticsymbol here is framed in exact agreement with our interpretation of Jlatthew,xvi. 18, <strong>and</strong> in flat contradiction to the papal interpretation. <strong>The</strong>gospel Church is seen by John in millennial glory, under the sj-mbol of acity. <strong>The</strong> city has twelve foundations, with the name of an apostle inscribedon each ;showing that the Church is built on the doctrine wliich

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!