13.07.2015 Views

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OF THE DRUIDS. 241all transgressors that <strong>of</strong>ieiided in <strong>the</strong>ir dominion,in <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Kassibelanus <strong>the</strong>re arose somecontroversy between <strong>the</strong> superial King Kasv»alhiwneand Ararwy, king <strong>of</strong> London, one <strong>of</strong> hisinferior kings, al)Out a mur<strong>the</strong>r committed. Tliecase is thus. The superial king keeping his courtwithin <strong>the</strong> dominion <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inferior kings,a controversy falling between twain within <strong>the</strong>court, and <strong>the</strong>re and <strong>the</strong>n one was slain, <strong>the</strong> questionis. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> inur<strong>the</strong>rer ought to be tryedby <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers and privilege <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snperior king,or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inferior king. I think that <strong>the</strong> mur<strong>the</strong>rerought to be tried by <strong>the</strong> law and custom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>inferior king s court, because it is more seemlythat <strong>the</strong> superior king s court, which did indurein that country but a week or twain, or such liketime, should lose his privilege <strong>the</strong>re for that time,than <strong>the</strong> inferior king's court should lose it forever. Vide in libra meo de legihus. It may seemto those that have judgment in histories, that thiswas tlie very cause that Ararwy would not havehis kinsman tried by <strong>the</strong> judges and laws or privilege<strong>of</strong> Kaswallawne, whose court did remain in<strong>the</strong> dominion <strong>of</strong> Ararwy but a little while, butwould have <strong>the</strong> felon tried by his judges and hiscourt.There is no mention made <strong>of</strong> Talaith anyw here amongst <strong>the</strong> Britons before <strong>the</strong> destruction<strong>of</strong> Britaifi, but that <strong>the</strong>re were in Britain but onesuperial crown and three Talaith or coronets orPrince's crowns; one for <strong>the</strong> Alban, ano<strong>the</strong>r for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!