13.07.2015 Views

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES. 407uniformly aai^its thall tbe Iriih were <strong>the</strong> real and 07ily Scots upto <strong>the</strong> efcventh" century ; or, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, that Irish and Scotswere synonimous terms.The plain English <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>the</strong>nis, that <strong>the</strong> poems <strong>of</strong>Ossian are both Scottish and au<strong>the</strong>ntic. If<strong>the</strong>re is evidence enough in <strong>the</strong> memoirs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irish Royal Societyto convince Pinkarton <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se poems,<strong>the</strong>re is certainly (considering his anticeltic prejudices) muchmore than enough to convince all <strong>the</strong> world besides. But <strong>the</strong>pity is, that Scotland and Ireland have pulled in opposite directions;and by preferring each, its individual and exclusive clairtthave perplexed and obscured, instead <strong>of</strong> illustrating this importantpoint. The contention is mean, contemptible, and gratuitous.It is a matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> utmost indifference whe<strong>the</strong>r we call<strong>the</strong>se poems Scottish or Irish^ or whe<strong>the</strong>r we blend both namestoge<strong>the</strong>r, and call <strong>the</strong>m Scoto.Irish.The claims <strong>of</strong> both nationsare solid and well founded, with this difference, that <strong>the</strong> claim<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Scots is more immediate and direcr, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irish moredistant and circuitous. Both nations are, however, sufHcientlyinterested to combine <strong>the</strong>ir efforts, and produce such document?as <strong>the</strong>y are respectively possessed <strong>of</strong>;and were this done, <strong>the</strong>reis not even <strong>the</strong> shadow <strong>of</strong> a doubt but <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sepoems might be placed on a basis so firm and stable^ as wouldbid defiance to all future cavil or controversy.Were Pinkarton a man <strong>of</strong> impartiality, or could we be certaiathat he had bestowed one serious thought on <strong>the</strong> subject, hisconcession that <strong>the</strong>sepoems were composed by <strong>the</strong> Jrish bards,would be <strong>of</strong> vast importance, because, according to his own definition,<strong>the</strong> Irish bards were <strong>the</strong> Scottish. Indeed, if <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se poems is once fixed, <strong>the</strong> claims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irish,and Scots can be satisfactorily adjusted.But Pinkarton gives<strong>the</strong>se poems to <strong>the</strong> Irishfrom mere whim and caprice, becausehe is determined not to give <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> St'ots; and had thsWelch preferred <strong>the</strong> slightest claim to <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>re is not a doubtbut he would have given <strong>the</strong>m to Caradoc <strong>of</strong> Lancarvon^ or OwenGlendower, without a scruple. But what justice can any Scotexpect from him, when he wrecks his fury on <strong>the</strong> very name, and3 F 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!