13.07.2015 Views

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

thing would IiappenNOTES. S.93were <strong>the</strong> English characters applied to <strong>the</strong>Greek or Hebrew languages. But where a language has notbeen written, any alphabet will suit it, and <strong>the</strong>y easily coalesceand assimilate. Had <strong>the</strong> Irish (Celtic) language not been a writtenone, and its orthography settled, before <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> St.Patrick, <strong>the</strong>re could have been no possible obstacle to <strong>the</strong> introduction<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman alphabet in its fullest extent. Indeed,had this not been <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman alphabetwould have followed as a necessary and inevitable consequence,though <strong>the</strong> Saint had been determined to prevent it.7mo. Its antiquity. Many attempts have been made by Pinkarton,and o<strong>the</strong>rs, to get rid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient Irish alphabet.Theyhave rendered it a sort <strong>of</strong> short hand wriiing^ invented about <strong>the</strong>tenth or eleventh century^—<strong>the</strong> Notae Longobardicae— Runiccharacters— magical or hieroglyphical letters, &c. But <strong>the</strong>irgrand argument is, that St, Patrick introduced <strong>the</strong> Roman lettersin 432. Were we to grant this, it is <strong>the</strong> greatest death blowwhich <strong>the</strong>se gentlemen could receive, for it must <strong>the</strong>n follow,that such manuscripts as are written in <strong>the</strong> ancient Irish characters,are older than <strong>the</strong> asra <strong>of</strong> St. Patrick,characters were invented several centuries after St.But (say <strong>the</strong>y) <strong>the</strong>sePatrick hadintroduced <strong>the</strong> Roman alphabet. This concession would beequally fatal to <strong>the</strong>m, for it would <strong>the</strong>n follow, that St. Patrickwas not <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Irish letters, o<strong>the</strong>rwise it would have beentotally unnecessary for <strong>the</strong> Irish to frame an alphabet to <strong>the</strong>mselvesseveral centuries after his arrival. The truth is, that <strong>the</strong>Irish had an alphabet before <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> St. Patrick, and that,prior to that asra, <strong>the</strong> orthography <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir language was fixed;and though St. Patrick and <strong>the</strong> christian clergy wrote <strong>the</strong> Irishlanguage in Roman characters, still <strong>the</strong>y found itimpossible toadd one letter more to <strong>the</strong> Iri^h alphabet than it originally possessed.The genius and orthography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> language renderedit impracticable. If any reinforcement from <strong>the</strong> Roman alphabetwas necessary, it was most particularly <strong>the</strong> letters v and ^/,yet <strong>the</strong>se were never introduced. Tha't <strong>the</strong> Irish alphabet hashad its gradations fiom rudeness to perfection, is i\o more than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!