13.07.2015 Views

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES. 383o^^^iy maintalne^l, and as strenuously controTf rted.To do justiceto this discussion, would require a volume.Pinkarton andJnne.9 have, above all o<strong>the</strong>rs, strained every effort in <strong>the</strong> negative,and adduced every argument to that effect which ingenuity couldinvent, or prejudice suggest.By adverting to <strong>the</strong> argmnc nts <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se gentlemen, I will, in some measure, be able to do justiceto <strong>the</strong> subject, and at <strong>the</strong> same time confine myself within <strong>the</strong>bounds to which <strong>the</strong>se notes must necessarily be limited. Both<strong>the</strong>se gentlemen owed Mr. Toland a grudge, though on very differentgrounds.Pinkarton was sensible his Gothic system couldnever stand, till <strong>the</strong> Celts, and every thing Celtic, were completelyannihilated, and hence hisinveterate antipathy to Toland,who was not only a Celt, but a strenuous assertor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>antiquity, civilization, and early literature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Celts.InneSyon llie o<strong>the</strong>r hand, was a Popish clergyman, a staunch Jacobite,and an inflexible advocate for <strong>the</strong> dimne right <strong>of</strong>reignmg.Thisdivine right <strong>of</strong> kings was, by Toland and <strong>the</strong> whigs, (for Tolandwas a rigid whig) ironically denominated <strong>the</strong> divine right <strong>of</strong> doingziwong.With men actaated by such discordant principles, wherea diversity <strong>of</strong> opinion was possible, no coincidence was to beexpected.INIr. Pinkarton (v. 2. p. 18. & 19.) insists that <strong>the</strong> Irish haveno claim to letters before St. Patrick introduced <strong>the</strong>m, alongwith Christianity, about <strong>the</strong> year 440. Yet this same gentleman,wishing to \ix <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>ntic history <strong>of</strong> his favourite Pictsas early as possible, dates it from <strong>the</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reign<strong>of</strong> Drust <strong>the</strong> Great, in 414, and assigns as a reason for this au<strong>the</strong>nticity,(v. l.p.275.) that, in 412, <strong>the</strong>re were /nVj clergymen whosettled in Pictland, and had <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> letters, and that traditionivas <strong>the</strong>n exchangedfor au<strong>the</strong>ntic history.If <strong>the</strong> Irish were unacquaintedwith letters till St. Patrick introduced <strong>the</strong>m in 440,or (as o<strong>the</strong>rs say) =n 432, it must follow that <strong>the</strong>se Irish clergywho settled in Pictland in 412, must also have been totally illiterate.Bat Mr. Pinkarton, it may be presumed, would notfound <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> his red-haired friends ona fiction, and hence it is evident, from his own account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>3 C 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!