A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

412 NOTES.named Soter, or Lagus^ the other Philadeiphus. The most famousof their kings who bore the name of Sesostris^ was sirnainedRameses Miriam. For distinction's sake, a series of kings ofthe same name must have some discriminating epithet or appellation.The Sesostris mentioned by Justin was probably surnamedVexores, and then both were the same person. There isnothing ascribed to them by Justin, that will not much betterapply to one person, than to two different persons. Sesostris,according to Justin, was the first usurper on record, and so wasVexores. According to Herodotus, Sesostris was the first Egyptianking who fought against the Scythians, and, according toJustin, it was Vexores. In order to solve all the difficulties ofthe case, we have only to suppose that the name of this king wasSesostris Vexores, whom Justin's stupidity (for it ishe was no great head piece) split into two different kings.well knownHowfortunate was it that he did not hit on Sesostris Rameses Miri^ftm, and split him into three. But this blunder of Justin wassingularly convenient for Pinkarton, because it placed his favouriteGoths (Scythians) on the throne of Asia 1312 years beforethe deluge, and hence he fights as strenuously forVexoresas he does for Gothidsm itself. Well aware that Justin, in thisparticular, is contradicted by every ancient author, without exception,he must l^ave been sensible that the case was hopelessand desperate in the extreme, and the proof he adduces is equallydesperate. He quotes Trogits, Trogus Pompeius, Ti^ogus* Nar,rative, Tragus' Ancient History, &c, without being able to produceone sentence, or even one word of that author. He mightat least have favoured us with one word, though it had been nolarger than the Utile ZQord Scot. But does this gentleman reallyimagine mankind so ignorant as not to know that Tragus" AncientHistory has been lost more than 1500 years, and that hisfriend Justin is violently suspected of having been the murdererof it. It would have been much the honester way to have toldns candidly that Trogus was dead and his work lost, and thathe had no evidence to adduce. Had Mr. Pinkarton a cause depiMiilingin the Court of Session, in which the evidence of TroguS