A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

NOTES.37eicurator of Gaul, and had an opportunity of knowing the studiesof the Gauls; and Agricola, his father-in-law, had an equal opportunityof knowing the studies of his noble pupils in Britain.Before Mr. Pinkarton can fix the charge of ignorance of letterson the Celts, he must— Imo, Disprove the direct testimony ofC^sar;—2do, He must prove that the Gauls were such fools,from time immemorial, as to resort to Britain to perfect theirstudies, under a race of men much more ignorant and illiteratethan themselves ;— 3tio, That the noble pupils of Agricola learnedto read the Roman language, and admired its beauties andelegance, without knowing one single letter ofthe alphabet ofthat, or any other language;—4to, That reading and writing arenot included in the number of the Liberal Arts, and consequentlywere not imparted to Agricola's pupils.It deserves particular notice, that Agricola resided in Britainonly about seven years, and the words of Tacitus seem to imply,that the sons of the nobility completed their education in the se.cond year.In the third year Agricola penetrated as far as theTay, But should we allow the whole seven years, the timewould have been totally inadequate, had Agricola had mere illiteratesavages to contend with. On the contrary he appears tohave found a well prepared, grateful and productive soil, an^Jthis can only be imputed to the Druids, who made the educationof the higher ranks their peculiar study and province. We hav€already seen (on the testimony of Cassar), that in his time theGauls had made some progress in the Greek, and still more inthe Roman language.The old Gaul mentioned by Lucian wa$profoundly skilled in the Greek language. It is not improbable,from their intercourse with the Romans, that the higherranks in Britsiia had, by thisi time, paid soma attention to theRoman language. Indeed the words of Tacitus imply as much— qui mode linguam Romanam ahnuebant— i. e. '' who latelyrejected the Roman language,*' for it is well known that a mancan neither approbate nor reprobate atotally ignorant.language of which he isWhen Tacitus was expressly treating on th^subject of British education, had the BritaUis beea ignorant of3 B 2