A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

—NOTES.33^Mr. Pinkarton, that he may appropriate to his beloved Gothsthe sepulchral monuments wherein burnt human bones are foundsays (vol. 1. p. 4[3,)—there is no room to believe that the Celtsever burned their dead at all. Will any man imagine (hat hecould be ignorant of the following passage of Ccesar (lib. 6. cap,19.) Funera sum^pro cultu Gallorum^ magnifica et simptuGsaomniaqiie quce vivis cordi fuisse arhitrantur in ignem inferuntetiam animalia; ac paiilo supra hancmemoriam servi et dientes^qaos abiis dilectos esse constabat, justis funebribus con/cctis, unacremabantur—i, e. " The funerals jf the Gauls, consideringtheir circumstances, are magnificent and sumptuous; and theythrow- into the fire whatever they imagine was most esteemedby the deceased when alive, and even animals.A little beforethe recollection of the present day, those servants and clientswho were most beloved by them (the necessary funeral rites beingperformed), were burnt along with them.'*stance of J.: r. Pinkarton's disingenuity.This is another in.Indeed he has, in many cases, hard work, but his dexterity isadmirable, though, in some instances, extremely ludicrous.Thevitrified forts in Scotland have outlived both history and tradition.There was therefore no authority for making them Pictishfor which cause he does not mention them in the teiii^ but informsus by a note, {v. 2. p.251.) that \h9.y were built by oneVault MacJdyrem the 13th century. In the present case hisusual ingenuity seems to have failed. As it was his intentionnot to ascribe them io the Celts, he should have assigned themto some gentleman of Gothic name; for as Vuull Macktyre was,from the very name, clearly a Celt, these edifices must still beCeltic. Strange! that he could not have rendered them a lususnature, or made Torfceus swallow them.The Celtic names which ev?ry where occur, are a source ofinfinite uneasiness to Mr. Plnkarton. lie has indeed laid itdown as an axiom, Thai language is the surest mark, wherebyto discover the origin of nations. Yet he will not allow one argumentto be deduced from this axiom in favour of the Celis^but monopolizss (he whols for his beloved Pk^ts,Did P^nden^