A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

KOTES. 429Albanach] and e?en in Galloway, where the tiame zo'dd Scot isstill proverbial, it is expressed, if we credit Buchanan, by Gal.luvid, the literal impert of which is GaUi sylvestres. The quasialia Insula of Tacitus, the Glacialis lerne of Claudian, the HUberni and Picti of Eumenius, the Scoiti and Fictiof Ammianus,Avith a few other ambiguous passages of the Roman authors, gavea plausible pretext for the ridiculous fiction that Scotia Antiqudwas Ireland.Sensible that the whole tenour of Roman evidencewas against them, the Irish mutilated the Dvan Albanach^ passedover the first Scottish colony under Riada^ with barely men.vtioning it, and then proceeded to the second colony, under Lonrnand Fergus, in 503. Having thus overstepped the Roman periodin Biitain, they gravely tell us that there were no Scots inBritain till 563, and that the Scots mentioned by the RomansMere Irish auxiliaries, Rot resident in Scotland, and that consequentlyIreland was Scotland.This foundation being laid, itis not to be wondered at, considering the influence and numbei'of the Irish Ecclesiastics, not only in Britain, but on the Continentof Europe, that this fraudulent imposition was widely.spread, and took deep root.Usher, Lloyd, Siillingfieet, O'Flaiierty,Keating, and many other respectable writers, were imposedon, and positively deny the existence of the first colonyaltogether ; and had it not been the publicAtion of the Duan ALoatiachy mutilated as it is, the error had been irretrievable.Mr. Toland, (see his Nazarenus) contrary to the opinion of theother Irish historians, had the honesty and disinterestedness taassert the existence of the first colony.Before dismissing this subject, it may not be improper to hazarda few remarks on the probable origin of the word SqoI.Aoimianus, under the year 360, is the "very first who mention'?the Scots and Picts, making war on the Romans.liOt drop a single hint that they were Irish auxiliaries.But he do? ^50\\ the^contrary, he always speaks of them as immediate, and at hand.The next author who mentions them is Ilieronyraus. In orderto get over the evidence of ihis author as superficially as possible,!}ilr. PinLaitun inserts Aitarotti instead of Scotl, oml te)h us.'>1