13.07.2015 Views

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

A new edition of Toland's History of the druids: - Free History Ebooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

—^06KOTES.Celts, obelises, or erect stones, were <strong>the</strong> only places <strong>of</strong> worship.The obelises sanctified by St. Patrick were undoubtedly Druidicalplaces <strong>of</strong> worship, and he could have no possible motive forconsecrating <strong>the</strong>m, except that <strong>of</strong> converting <strong>the</strong>m into christianchurches. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, it can hardly be imagined thatbe should have been so circumscribed as to be obliged to makeuse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Druidical terapies, or that he could have done sowithout <strong>the</strong> consent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Druids. The most natural inferenceis, that, seeing <strong>the</strong> Irish addicted to <strong>the</strong>ir idolatrous temples andpriests, St. Patrick sanctified <strong>the</strong> former, and converted <strong>the</strong> latter,making both subservient to <strong>the</strong> important purpose <strong>of</strong> propagatingChristianity. Indeed Mr. Toland asserts, that none camesooner into <strong>the</strong> christian religion^ or made a better figure in it^than <strong>the</strong> Druids,If this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is well founded, it clears up some points iaour ecclesiastical history, on which we have hi<strong>the</strong>rto little morethan mere conjecture. There appears to have been a studied designin St. Patrick and his successors, to consign <strong>the</strong> very name<strong>of</strong> Druid to oblivion. It is not mentioned (as far as I know)"by any ecclesiastical writer from <strong>the</strong> 4th to <strong>the</strong> 15th century,though it still existed in <strong>the</strong> Gaelic language, and in <strong>the</strong> numerousnames <strong>of</strong> temples, and o<strong>the</strong>r places denominated from <strong>the</strong>Druids. This policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early ecclesiastics in Ireland wasfounded on expediency, as well as necessity.The name Druidwas one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very first respect among <strong>the</strong> Celts, It was nowheremention(^d in <strong>the</strong> sacred records, and <strong>the</strong>re v,as consequentlyno express scriptural command to eradicate this particularspecies <strong>of</strong> idolatry. To remedy (his defect, <strong>the</strong> name appearsto have been altered to 3Iagi and Chaldci (Magicians ar.dChaldees), names strictly synonimous with that <strong>of</strong> Druid, andclearly condemned in scripture, Innes, in his Critical Essay(as has been noticed in a former note), vol, 2. p. 464. says" in <strong>the</strong> Latin lives <strong>of</strong> St. Patrick and Columba, <strong>the</strong> Druids arecalled Magi.-" In Adomnan's Life <strong>of</strong> St, Coi'umba, we have anaccount <strong>of</strong> an interview betwixt that saint and a few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seMagi, at <strong>the</strong> palace or castle <strong>of</strong> Brudi^ king <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Picts, in th«^"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!