09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

IS-IMG-SA 170 (3)<br />

The Future <strong>of</strong> Imaging in Glaucoma<br />

Schmetterer Leopold<br />

Imaging <strong>of</strong> the optic nerve head has become a standard tool in glaucoma<br />

management. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) may be superior to other<br />

methods due to its unprecedented reproducibility and sensitivity. It is, however,<br />

not clear yet whether OCT has the potential to fully replace older imaging<br />

technologies in glaucoma diagnosis. The present talk gives an overview<br />

<strong>of</strong> the current status and also introduces some approaches to extend OCT<br />

technology towards assessment <strong>of</strong> functional parameters.<br />

IS-IMG-SA 170 (4)<br />

The Value <strong>of</strong> Imaging in Clinical Praxis<br />

Hommer Anton (1)<br />

1. Hera Hospital<br />

The exact documentation <strong>of</strong> appearance and changes in optic nerve head and<br />

retinal nerve fiber layer is essential in our daily management <strong>of</strong> glaucoma and<br />

ocular hypertensive patients. Detailed manual drawing is the minimum for<br />

documentation. Digital Colour photography provides objective documentation,<br />

but quantitative imaging is only possible with computer assisted devices<br />

like GDx, HRT or OCT. Especially for follow up it is very difficult to quantify<br />

progression in fundus photography. The quantitative data for assessing<br />

progression like in HRT, GDx and OCT is providing important information to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer best follow up for structure analysis. The modern 3-dimensional imaging<br />

techniques are very promising to detect early changes but we always should<br />

remember that our clinical management should be in context with other<br />

important clinical data to evaluate correctly the relevance for the individual<br />

patient.<br />

Free Paper: Pediatric Ophthalmology, Genetics<br />

Sat 18 Feb 8:30 - 10:00 Capital Suite 13<br />

FP-PED-SA 171 (1)<br />

Simultaneous Bilateral Surgery in Congenital Cataract<br />

Srinivasan Renuka (1) , Mohanty Debashish (1) , Chikkabasavaiah Shivaprasad<br />

(1) (1)<br />

, Venkatraman Aarthi<br />

1. Jawaharlal Institute <strong>of</strong> Postgraduate Medical Sciences and Research<br />

Purpose: To evaluate the risks and benefits <strong>of</strong> simultaneous bilateral surgery in<br />

congenital cataract .<br />

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the postoperative course <strong>of</strong> 64 eyes <strong>of</strong><br />

32 children who underwent bilateral cataract surgery in single sitting. There<br />

were 20 cases <strong>of</strong> congenital rubella syndrome, 8 with heart diseases, 2<br />

galactosemia, 2 very low birth weight and one case each with homocystinuria<br />

and hemophilia. Age <strong>of</strong> the patients ranged from 2 months to 7 years with most<br />

being under 2 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Results: No major intraoperative complication was noted. On postoperative<br />

follow up for 6 months, none <strong>of</strong> the cases developed endophthalmitis. One<br />

case developed traumatic hyphaema at 2nd postoperative week. Two cases<br />

developed grade 4 uveitis in both eyes which was relieved with topical steroid<br />

medication.<br />

Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral congenital cataract surgery is a useful<br />

option for cases with high systemic risk pr<strong>of</strong>ile like associated heart diseases<br />

as to avoid a second general anesthesia. It also reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> amblyopia.<br />

In selected cases <strong>of</strong> bilateral cataracts, the benefits <strong>of</strong> cataract surgery in<br />

single sitting outweighs, the potential risks and should be considered the<br />

primary option.<br />

180<br />

FP-PED-SA 171 (2)<br />

Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children: A Decade Long<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Safety and Refractive Outcomes<br />

Monga Sumit (1) , Hariprasad Bhamy (1) , Gupta Amit (1) , Sachdeva Virender (2) ,<br />

Kekunnaya Ramesh (1)<br />

1. L V Prasad Eye Institute<br />

2. L V Prasad Eye Institute<br />

Purpose: To determine the safety, refractive outcome and the prediction error<br />

in surgically aphakic children undergoing secondary intraocular lens<br />

implantation (IOL).<br />

Methods: Retrospective, interventional case series <strong>of</strong> children who underwent<br />

secondary IOL implantation, post congenital cataract surgery, between January<br />

2000 and December 2010. Study parameters included patient demography,<br />

best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation and final follow up, target<br />

refraction, complications and prediction error at 3 months.<br />

Results: 174 eyes <strong>of</strong> 104 children (M/F=68/36) were included in the study.<br />

Mean duration, for secondary IOL implantation was 6.08± 3.75 years for males<br />

and 5.6±2.8 years for females, after primary cataract surgery. Mean follow-up<br />

was 25.70+ 24.99 months (3 to 127 months; median-18 months). BCVA was<br />

&#8805;20/80 in 31.03% <strong>of</strong> children. Target refraction was age appropriate.<br />

The mean prediction error at 3 months was 1.65+2.46 diopters (3.25 D to 11D).<br />

Mean spherical equivalent at 3 months was -0.009D+ 2.43D (range -7 D to<br />

6D). Complications included wound leak (2), hyphema (2), glaucoma (11), and<br />

optic capture (15).<br />

Conclusion: Secondary IOL implantation is a relatively safe procedure in<br />

children. Though age based refraction is targeted, there is a possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

prediction error and refractive surprises.<br />

FP-PED-SA 171 (3)<br />

Traumatic Pediatric Cataract in Central India: Etiology, Visual<br />

Outcomes and Prognostic Treatment Variables<br />

Sahu Anupam (1,2) , Agrawal Deepshikha (1,2) , Chatterjee Samrat (1,2) , Malhotra<br />

Sumeet (1,2)<br />

1. MGM Eye Institute<br />

2. All India Ophthalmological Society<br />

Objective: To analyze mode <strong>of</strong> presentation and effect <strong>of</strong> prognostic variables<br />

on clinical outcome following surgical management <strong>of</strong> traumatic cataract<br />

amongst children.<br />

Methods: Retrospective review <strong>of</strong> 77 eyes with traumatic cataract in patients<br />

younger than 17 years who underwent surgical intervention at our institute<br />

from March 2005 to December 2010. Results: Open globe injuries accounted<br />

for 69% <strong>of</strong> cases. 59.7% <strong>of</strong> the trauma occurred in rural setting. Commonest<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> trauma was wooden sticks and arrows in both rural (32.6%) and urban<br />

(32.2%) settings. Visual acuity improved from < 20/200 in 91.7% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

preoperatively to ? 20/80 in 72.6% <strong>of</strong> patients postoperatively (P=0.0001).<br />

Involvement <strong>of</strong> retina (36%) was the major factor leading to decreased<br />

postoperative vision. Improvement in visual acuity was not significantly<br />

associated with type <strong>of</strong> trauma (P=0.86), timing <strong>of</strong> surgery (P=0.69), lens<br />

implantation (P=0.33) or type <strong>of</strong> lens implanted (P=0.95). Visual axis<br />

opacification (VAO) occurred in 12.9% cases, 20% <strong>of</strong> which needed surgical<br />

intervention. While VAO was significantly associated with intact posterior<br />

capsule (P=0.01), it was not statistically associated with lens implantation<br />

(P=0.11) or type <strong>of</strong> lens implanted (P=0.61).<br />

Conclusion: Primary management <strong>of</strong> posterior capsule should be attempted in<br />

all cases for better visual outcome.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!