09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Basic: Intraocular Pressure in Clinical Practice<br />

Thu 16 Feb 9:00 - 10:30 Hall 11<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (1)<br />

Positional Changes and IOP: New Considerations<br />

Sit Arthur<br />

1. Mayo Clinic<br />

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is known to vary with body position. However, recent<br />

work suggests that head and neck position, as well as posture, affects IOP. IOP<br />

is lowest when measured while sitting with the neck in the neutral position. All<br />

other head and body positions result in an elevation <strong>of</strong> IOP compared to the<br />

position used for typical clinical measurements. These IOP elevations should<br />

be considered as potential areas <strong>of</strong> caution for glaucoma patients.<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (2)<br />

IOP fluctuation, Peak or Mean: What Matters Most in Managing<br />

Glaucoma?<br />

Susanna Jr. Remo<br />

1. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo<br />

Mean IOP, fluctuation and peak may be independent risk factor for progression.<br />

However, it is extremely important to know which one is the most important<br />

parameter in glaucoma progression. Regarding IOP fluctuation, there are<br />

conflicting results in the literature. Some studies demonstrate that this<br />

parameter is important as a risk factor for glaucoma progression while others<br />

state the opposite. This presentation will show in a practical way how to assess<br />

such parameters and its importance.<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (3)<br />

Target Pressures: How Useful Are They?<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fmann Esther<br />

1. University Medical Center Mainz<br />

Target pressure is a useful concept in the treatment and management <strong>of</strong><br />

glaucoma patients. What does target pressure mean? It is the highest IOP<br />

level that is expected to prevent glaucoma progression. Target IOP depends<br />

on the IOP level before treatment, the stage <strong>of</strong> glaucoma, age /life expectancy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patient, rate <strong>of</strong> progression (fast versus slow), presence <strong>of</strong> risk factors.<br />

Target IOP is not a constant but a variable. It might be re-assessed during<br />

follow up <strong>of</strong> the patient and might require adjustment.<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (4)<br />

How Should we be Initiating and Adding Medical Therapy?<br />

Realini Tony<br />

1. West Virginia University<br />

IOP is a dynamic biological parameter. IOP changes resulting from initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

IOP-lowering therapy can be masked or mimicked by spontaneous IOP<br />

fluctuations. The monocular drug trial has been utilized for decades as a<br />

means <strong>of</strong> distinguishing between therapeutic and spontaneous IOP changes.<br />

Recent work demonstrates the monocular trial is not the useful clinical tool it<br />

was once thought to be. In this presentation, the flaws <strong>of</strong> the monocular drug<br />

trial will be reviewed and an alternative method <strong>of</strong> assessing the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

IOP-lowering therapy will be presented.<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (5)<br />

Laser Trabeculoplasty and Intraocular Pressure: What Can We<br />

Expect?<br />

Harasymowycz Paul<br />

1. University <strong>of</strong> Montreal<br />

This practical and study-based presentation should assist delegates in<br />

estimating IOP reduction post SLT, depending on angle pigmentation, type and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pre-laser medications, amount <strong>of</strong> angle treated, as well as duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> treatment effect.<br />

IS-GLA-TH 01 (6)<br />

Corneal Thickness: Does it Matter?<br />

Morales Jose<br />

1. King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital<br />

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

Goldmann applanation tonometry has been the gold standard for IOP<br />

measurement, but its values are affected by corneal thickness . The Ocular<br />

Hypertension Study suggested that CCT was an important risk factor for OHT<br />

to POAG conversion. This session will address who benefits most from CCT<br />

assessment, whether adjustment formulas for CCT thickness and true IOP<br />

values are useful, how factors that affect CCT/glaucoma development might be<br />

interrelated and instruments less affected by CCT. Clinical practice implications<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Refractive Surgery Techniques: State <strong>of</strong> the Art<br />

Thu 16 Feb 9:00 - 10:30 Hall 1<br />

IS-REF-TH 02 (1)<br />

Patient Selection and Evaluation for Cornea Refractive Surgery<br />

Klyce Stephen<br />

1. Mount Sinai School <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

Approving candidates for traditional refractive surgery relies on careful<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the patient during the screening process. Tests include<br />

corneal topography, wavefront if needed, manifest refraction, pupillometry,<br />

IOP, pachymetry, Schirmer or TearLab, cycloplegic refraction, mydriatic slit<br />

lamp exam, and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Corneal topography should be<br />

the first examination before the tear film is altered by drops or prolonged<br />

examination. This talk reviews the best methods to detect abnormalities in<br />

corneal topography-the highest risk factor for the development <strong>of</strong> ectasia after<br />

refractive surgery.<br />

IS-REF-TH 02 (2)<br />

Surface Ablation<br />

McDonald Marguerite<br />

1. Ophthalmic Consultants <strong>of</strong> Long Island<br />

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was the first iteration <strong>of</strong> laser vision<br />

correction. LASIK was developed several years after PRK, to deal with the only<br />

two drawbacks <strong>of</strong> this safe and highly successful surgery: early postoperative<br />

pain and relatively slow return <strong>of</strong> vision (1- 2 weeks). Recent breakthroughs<br />

in pharmacology, molecular biology/wound healing, and shield technology<br />

have improved the postoperative comfort and speed <strong>of</strong> return <strong>of</strong> vision, making<br />

PRK nearly equal to LASIK in these two areas. These breakthroughs will be<br />

reviewed<br />

IS-REF-TH 02 (3)<br />

LASIK<br />

Sabry Moataz<br />

abstract not available<br />

IS-REF-TH 02 (4)<br />

ReLEx<br />

Ibrahim Osama<br />

ReLEx uses VisuMax laser to cut intrastromal lenticule that is extracted through<br />

a flap-like opening (FLEx) or microincision (SMILE). 349 eyes underwent<br />

procedure. Mean SER was -0.41 D ± 0.63 D and mean astigmatism was<br />

-0.41 D ± 0.63 D with 72% within +/- 0.5 and 89% within +/- 1.0 D. 83% <strong>of</strong><br />

eyes showed uncorrected VA <strong>of</strong> 20/20 or better and 94 % <strong>of</strong> cases 20/25 or<br />

better. Corneal topography showed excellent centration and flattening . Wave<br />

front measurements showed less induced aberration than LASIK.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!