09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FP-CAT-SA 173 (2)<br />

The Visual and Refractive Outcomes <strong>of</strong> AcryS<strong>of</strong> Toric Intraocular<br />

Lens in Subjects with Cataracts and Corneal Astigmatism<br />

Hashemian Seyed Javad (1)<br />

1. Eye Reaserch Center, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran Uneversity <strong>of</strong> MS<br />

Objective: To assess visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability<br />

after phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.<br />

Prospective, nonrandomized, observational case series. 48 eyes <strong>of</strong> consecutive<br />

patients with more than 1.50 diopter (D) <strong>of</strong> preexisting corneal astigmatism<br />

having phacoemulsification with AcryS<strong>of</strong> Toric IOL. UCVA, BCVA, refractive<br />

sphere, and keratometric and refractive cylinder were recorded preoperatively<br />

and 2 and 6 months after surgery. Toric IOL axis shift was also measured.<br />

Results: Preoperatively, 100% <strong>of</strong> patients BCVA were lower than 20/40. At 6<br />

months postoperation, UCVA was 20/40 or better in 95.8% <strong>of</strong> the eyes, with<br />

66.6 % achieving 20/25 or better. 100 % <strong>of</strong> eyes achieved 20/4 or better<br />

BCVA. Mean refractive cylinder was reduced significantly after surgery from<br />

2.800 D to0.901 D (P < .001). Vector analysis to compare attempted vs.<br />

achieved correction showed that 93.2% <strong>of</strong> eyes were within ± 1.00 D for the<br />

spherical equivalent, and 89.4% <strong>of</strong> eyes were within ±0.50 D for the astigmatic<br />

components. Mean toric IOL axis rotation was2.68 ± 2.72 degrees, being < 5<br />

degrees in 95.8% <strong>of</strong> eyes evaluated.<br />

Conclusions: Implantation <strong>of</strong> the AcryS<strong>of</strong> toric IOL proved to be an effective,<br />

safe, and predictable method <strong>of</strong> managing corneal astigmatism in cataract<br />

patients.<br />

FP-CAT-SA 173 (3)<br />

Outcomes after WIOL - CF Accommodative Intraocular Lens<br />

Implantation<br />

Pallikaris Ioannis (1) , Portaliou Dimitra (1)<br />

1. Institute <strong>of</strong> Vision and Optics (VEMMO - IVO)<br />

Methods: 25 patients (50 eyes) with mean age 65, 3 ± 8, four years underwent<br />

routine cataract surgery and WIOL - CF accommodative IOL. The WIOL- CF<br />

accommodative IOL design is based on the biomimetic principle according to<br />

which the hydro gel material used and the lens geometry simulate some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

key properties <strong>of</strong> the crystalline lens itself providing pseudo-accommodation<br />

capability.<br />

Results: Mean follow up was 11,44 ± 2,46 months. Uncorrected Distance<br />

Visual Acuity (UDVA) improved from 0,31 ± 0,17 preoperatively to 0,74 ±<br />

0,19 and Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) improved from 0,61 ±<br />

0,19 preoperatively to 0,82 ± 0,13 at the last follow - up examination. 88% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients gained one or more lines <strong>of</strong> CDVA while 72% had J1 to J1 - J2, at the<br />

last follow up, measured with Birkhauser reading charts at a distance <strong>of</strong> 35 cm<br />

under photopic conditions. No complications occurred intra or postoperatively.<br />

Pseudo-accommodation was assessed using the iTrace technology.<br />

Conclusion: WIOL - CF accommodative IOL implantation can restore some<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> natural accommodation providing satisfactory visual outcomes for<br />

both distant and near vision.<br />

FP-CAT-SA 173 (4)<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Spherical and<br />

Aspherical Intraocular Lenses<br />

Pai Vijaya (1) , Shetty Priyanka (1) , Hazarika Manali<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical Colleege<br />

Aim: To compare the contrast sensitivity among eyes implanted with spherical<br />

and aspherical intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification surgery in both<br />

photopic and mesopic conditions .<br />

Materials and methods: Total number <strong>of</strong> 81 patients were included in the study.<br />

Group 1 had spherical intraocular lens [IOL], Acrys<strong>of</strong> SA60AT[Alcon] and<br />

Group 2 “had Acrys<strong>of</strong> SN60WF[Alcon] IOL implanted. Contrast sensitivity was<br />

measured with Pelli Robson chart in both photopic and mesopic conditions<br />

with best glass correction at 6 weeks postop period. SPSS 11.5 s<strong>of</strong>tware was<br />

used for statistical analysis.<br />

Results: There were 44 patients in group 1 and 37 in group 2. The median age<br />

was 71 years in the group 2 versus 62 yrs in the group 1. The mean best<br />

corrected vision was 6/6p in both the groups. In group 1 the mean photopic<br />

contrast sensitivity was 1.39 and mesopic was 1.40. In group 2 the mean<br />

contrast sensitivity was 1.37 in both photopic and mesopic conditions.<br />

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the contrast sensitivity in<br />

both the groups. There was no significant difference between mesopic and<br />

photopic contrast sensitivity.<br />

FP-CAT-SA 173 (5)<br />

Bilateral Implantation <strong>of</strong> Artificial Iris<br />

Novak Jan (1) , Almesmary Abulgasim Adam (2)<br />

1. Department Ophthalmology, Regional Hospital Pardubice<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Omar Al-Mukhtar University<br />

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

Purpose: A case report is concerned with effectiveness and safety <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

artificial iris implant and the method <strong>of</strong> its implantation in the case <strong>of</strong> large pupil<br />

expected after cataract surgery.<br />

Methods: Artificial acrylic coloured membrane (named an artificial iris) was<br />

implanted bilateral in one patient with mydriatic pupils after previous<br />

bilateral acute glaucoma attact and resulting cataract. The single piece IOL<br />

was implanted into the bag after a standard phaco and above the IOL was<br />

implanted also into the bag the artificial iris (diameter <strong>of</strong> 9mm, inner hole <strong>of</strong><br />

4mm) using a standard cartridge <strong>of</strong> 2,2mm. The colour was used according to<br />

periphery <strong>of</strong> own iris.<br />

Result: Bilateral UCVA 0,79 six month after surgery. No surgical or late<br />

complication. The patient satisfied with the cosmetic effect.<br />

Conclusion: Intracapsular implantation <strong>of</strong> the artificial iris combined with any<br />

IOL is seen to be a solution <strong>of</strong> the expected large pupil after cataract surgery.<br />

FP-CAT-SA 173 (6)<br />

Multivariate Nonparametric Techniques for Astigmatism Analysis<br />

Miller Kevin (1,2)<br />

1. David Geffen School <strong>of</strong> Medicine at UCLA<br />

2. Jules Stein Eye Institute<br />

Purpose: To demonstrate the application <strong>of</strong> nonparametric multivariate<br />

statistical methods to the analysis <strong>of</strong> astigmatism treatment outcomes.<br />

Methods: Nonparametric methods were applied to a published dataset and 12<br />

test data sets that were created for test purposes. The nonparametric tests<br />

were rank-based multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (MANOVA), sign-based<br />

MANOVA, and bootstrapping based on Hotelling›s T2 statistic.<br />

Results: Re-analysis <strong>of</strong> the published dataset using the three nonparametric<br />

tests detected statistically significant treatment effects at all postoperative<br />

examinations. The three nonparametric tests were able to detect differences<br />

in astigmatism outcomes for multiple test data sets that simulated normal<br />

distributions. For the test data sets that simulated non-normal distributions,<br />

Hotelling›s T2 test and bootstrapping based on Hotelling›s T2 statistic were<br />

only able to detect a difference in one test data set while rank- and sign-based<br />

MANVOA were able to detect differences in outcomes for multiple data sets.<br />

Conclusions: For data sets where the rectangular components <strong>of</strong> astigmatism<br />

vectors do not distribute normally in both dimensions, only nonparametric<br />

statistical methods are valid. Sign-based MANOVA was the most sensitive test<br />

for detecting differences in non-normally distributed astigmatism outcomes in<br />

our data sets.<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!